Formal Model-Driven Development of Communicating Systems

Laibinis, Linas; Troubitsynå, Elena; Leppänen, Sari; Lilius, Johan; Malik, Qaisar A.

doi:10.1007/11576280_14

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The FMBRSE methodology also provides a formal verification environment using model checking (see step (6) in Fig. 2).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The clear and simple transformation can be easily traced between Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. The functions (1) to (6) given in Sect. 4.1 were implemented as state machines (see Figs.…”

Section: Implementation Behavior Of Detection Point Using Yakindumentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Its parameters and declarations sections are empty. (6) run permission to the ''runcontrol'' using channel CYCLE. The ''runcontrol'' automaton notifies the ''tick'' automaton when it has finished running using the variable ISRUN.…”

Section: Constructed Automata In Uppaalmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The proposed specification-verification environment aims to decrease the need for mathematical and computer-science background/knowledge at the system development level. Our framework integrates a set of wellknown and widely used methods, techniques, and tools such as object-oriented formalisms (e.g., the Unified Modeling Language [5]), model-driven development [6], and model checking [7]. The application of the methodology supports the construction of correct, complete, consistent, and verifiable functional specifications.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Formal Modeling and Verification of the Functionality of Electronic Urban Railway Control Systems Through a Case Study

Lukács

Bartha

2022

Urban Rail Transit

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a formal model-based methodology to support railway engineers in the design of safe electronic urban railway control systems. The purpose of our research is to overcome the deficiencies of existing traditional design methodologies, namely the incompleteness and the potential presence of contradictions in the system specification resulting from non-formal development techniques. We illustrate the application of the methodology via a case study of a tram-road level crossing protection system. It was chosen partly because it has a simple architecture and a small number of elements, thus it fits the scope limitations of this article. At the same time, it is suitable for presenting all essential features of our methodology. The proposed solution provides a specification/verification environment that facilitates the construction of correct, complete, consistent, and verifiable functional specifications during the development, while hiding all the formal method-related details from the railway engineers writing the specifications. Using this formal model-based methodology, a high-quality functional specification can be achieved, which is guaranteed to be more exhaustive and will contain fewer errors than traditional development.

show abstract

“…The FMBRSE methodology also provides a formal verification environment using model checking (see step (6) in Fig. 2).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The clear and simple transformation can be easily traced between Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. The functions (1) to (6) given in Sect. 4.1 were implemented as state machines (see Figs.…”

Section: Implementation Behavior Of Detection Point Using Yakindumentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Constructed Automata In Uppaalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Formal Modeling and Verification of the Functionality of Electronic Urban Railway Control Systems Through a Case Study

Lukács

Bartha

2022

Urban Rail Transit

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some, but not all of the consistency rules for the modeling concepts and for their relationships are checked by the wizards. In future, the work done for formalizing and implementing the correct-by-construction paradigm for Lyra (see for example (Ilic et al, 2006) (Leppänen et al, 2005) (Laibinis et al, 2005a) (Laibinis et al, 2005b) (Laibinis et al, 2006)) will be implemented as a part of the automation approach. This increases significantly the coverage of consistency checking, and enhances the approach with automated generation of fault tolerance properties to the system models.…”

Section: Experiencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Workflow Automation for System Architecting

Turunen

Leppänen

2008

Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Managing the ever-growing complexity of even mass-market products, such as mobile phones, is becoming increasingly hard without the adoption of improved system development methods, such as model-based development. To allow industrial use of such methods, tools that are able automate development tasks as far as possible are needed. In this paper, we present a partly automated system design flow based on the Lyra method with UML 2.0 language and Telelogic Tau G2 modeling tool. We discuss how the tool was extended to support automation of some central tasks in Lyra and show a running example of the design flow. In the example, a telephony functionality of a mobile device is modeled producing an executable specification for the system. The efficiency gains from the automation are promising.

show abstract