2017
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360x.2017.00269.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forsus Appliance-A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sood S, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Sood M, Gulati S (2011) 12,13 had done a study on Class II division 1 malocclusion, there was a significant decrease in the muscle activity at one month after Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device insertion during swallowing of saliva and maximal voluntary clenching which gradually returned to pre-treatment levels at the end of six months. G. Bhavani, R. Navaneethan (2017) 14 suggested that significant skeletal changes commonly seen are the restriction of the maxillary growth and the increase in mandibular length. However, the restriction of the maxillary growth is more predominant than that of the increase in mandibular length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sood S, Kharbanda OP, Duggal R, Sood M, Gulati S (2011) 12,13 had done a study on Class II division 1 malocclusion, there was a significant decrease in the muscle activity at one month after Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device insertion during swallowing of saliva and maximal voluntary clenching which gradually returned to pre-treatment levels at the end of six months. G. Bhavani, R. Navaneethan (2017) 14 suggested that significant skeletal changes commonly seen are the restriction of the maxillary growth and the increase in mandibular length. However, the restriction of the maxillary growth is more predominant than that of the increase in mandibular length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%