2014
DOI: 10.1002/num.21892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forty Years of the Crouzeix‐Raviart element

Abstract: Since the nonconforming P 1 finite element method for the Stokes equations was introduced by M. Crouzeix and P.A. Raviart in 1973, there have been many advances in the finite element methodologies for nonconforming methods. This article, which is based on the Babuška Lecture at MAFELAP 2013, surveys some of these developments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
(168 reference statements)
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where we use the discrete Sobolev inequality and the fact that ∇χ belongs to the Crouzeix-Raviar finite element space [9]. This implies the bound (3.19).…”
Section: Fully Discrete Approximationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where we use the discrete Sobolev inequality and the fact that ∇χ belongs to the Crouzeix-Raviar finite element space [9]. This implies the bound (3.19).…”
Section: Fully Discrete Approximationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a direct application of the gradient recovery method, we naturally define a recovery-type a posteriori error estimator for the surface Crouzeix-Raviart element. The local a posteriori error estimator on each element T is defined as 9) and the global error estimator as…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, the condition (H2) is a strong assumption. For example, generally the shape functions of the Crouzeix-Raviart non-conforming element [11] are only continuous at n − 1 points on a n − 1 dimensional face. However, with the DoF-transfer operation, the resulting finite element functions are continuous at each vertex.…”
Section: A Discrete Korn Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%