1990
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1990)116:3(432)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foundation Impedance Functions: Theory Versus Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Testing by Crouse et al (1990) was performed on foundation pads for typical accelerograph installations. Tested foundations were ~ 1.2m square concrete pads with and without corner piers.…”
Section: Soil-structure Interaction Research Opportunties Previous Tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing by Crouse et al (1990) was performed on foundation pads for typical accelerograph installations. Tested foundations were ~ 1.2m square concrete pads with and without corner piers.…”
Section: Soil-structure Interaction Research Opportunties Previous Tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental determination of these functions has also been a difficult task (Crouse et al, 1990).…”
Section: Modal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a number of experimental field studies for both surface and embedded foundations for instance, significant discrepancies between theory and experiment were found in both response magnitude and resonance frequencies in vertical against lateral motions (e.g. Fry 1963;Novak & Beredugo, 1972;Stokoe & Richart, 1974;Wong et al, 1977;Lin & Jennings, 1984;Crouse & Hushmand 1989;Crouse et al 1990;Gazetas & Stokoe, 1991) even under special uniform conditions (e.g. Erden, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%