Founder social capital and value appropriation in R&amp;D alliance agreements

Devarakonda, Ramakrishna; Reuer, Jeffrey J.; Tadikonda, Dutt Dev Harsha

doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104474

Cited by 10 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 126 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Green relational capital represents the commitment made by partners to environmental responsibility (Carter & Jennings, 2002), thus reducing, for the focal firm, the risk associated with investing in environmental innovation. Long‐term interactions and communication establish strong social relationships between the focal firm and inter‐firm partners (Devarakonda et al, 2022). Mutual interests with partners over the long term enable the focal firm to invest in environmental innovation more determinedly.…”

Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Green relational capital, integration capabilities and environmental innovation adoption: The moderating role of normative pressures

Long

Liao

2022

Sustainable Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Environmental innovation has received increasing attention recently among scholars and policy-makers. Drawing on diffusion of innovation theory, social capital theory, dynamic capabilities theory and institutional theory, we propose that green relational capital positively influences firms' environmental innovation adoption activities. This research used survey data from 392 manufacturing firms in China. The results show that green relational capital produces a positive influence on both the speed and comprehensiveness of environmental innovation adoption, and this effect is mediated by firms' integration capabilities. Moreover, normative pressures positively moderate the relationship between green relational capital and integration capabilities.

show abstract

Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Green relational capital, integration capabilities and environmental innovation adoption: The moderating role of normative pressures

Long

Liao

2022

Sustainable Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…argue that entrepreneurship policies should focus on human capital instead of economic capital because education and managerial experience play a bigger role in encouraging entrepreneurship than income and wealth. Given awareness that social capital deficiencies can preclude would-be founders from establishing and growing their businesses (Devarakonda et al, 2022), startup-centric innovation policies have used bonding and bridging capital building efforts, such as role model campaigns and coaching, mentoring, and networking (Klingler-Vidra and Liu, 2020). Social-capital-motivated startup policies have been found to strive to deliver strategic "access benefits" to incumbent firms around access to ideas and talent (Klingler-Vidra and Pacheco Pardo, 2022).…”

Section: Towards a Systemic Definition Of Startup-centric Innovation ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Essays on the Political Economy of Innovative Startups

Seng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The thesis examines the political economy of innovative startups through three essays. The three main chapters of the thesis comprise three individual research papers written to answer separate research questions, but they are all bounded together by a common aim of investigating the political economy of innovative startups and how the wider contextual environment affects startup growth. In this regard, the first paper is a theoretical piece that positions startup-centric innovation policy in the wider literature on industrial policy. Together with my co-authors, we conceptualise startup-centric innovation policy in terms of four key attributes – age/newness, type of firm, target audience, and instruments used. The second paper investigates the role and influence of government policy on the development of the entrepreneurial ecosystem in terms of its coordinative aspects and underlying ecosystem dynamics. Finally, the third paper examines cultural change in the entrepreneurial ecosystem and its role on startup venture creation.

show abstract

Are corporate affiliations conducive to nascent entrepreneurship?

Hopp,

Pruschak,

Krebs

2024

Int Entrep Manag J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Founding an entrepreneurial venture does not comprise a dichotomous choice between market entry and non-entry; instead, a wide variety of entrepreneurial strategies are available to the nascent entrepreneur. Using data from the second Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics (PSED II), a representative sample of nascent entrepreneurial activity in the United States, this study documents that nascent entrepreneurs generally choose between founding an independent new venture and following a type of corporate-affiliated entrepreneurial strategy (CAES), such as a franchise, spin-off, or similar approach. The success of this decision is contingent upon entrepreneurs’ stock of human capital. Relevant industry experiences tend to reduce the likelihood of an entrepreneur employing a CAES, while managerial experience and previous start-up experience increases the probability. Overall, those nascent entrepreneurs who follow a CAES are more likely to achieve a first positive cash-flow; this highlights the benefits of corporate affiliations in the field of new venture founding.

show abstract

Founder social capital and value appropriation in R&D alliance agreements

Cited by 10 publications

References 126 publications

Green relational capital, integration capabilities and environmental innovation adoption: The moderating role of normative pressures

Green relational capital, integration capabilities and environmental innovation adoption: The moderating role of normative pressures

Essays on the Political Economy of Innovative Startups

Are corporate affiliations conducive to nascent entrepreneurship?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About