Four archetypes of process improvement: a Q-methodological study

Abstract

This paper explores the process improvement approaches of organisations. It seeks to identify process redesign principles and the combinations of these principles that are used successfully in industry. We use Q-methodology to explore the viewpoints of a range of highly-experienced process experts about the success of 16 improvement practices. Qmethodology enables the examination of the similarities and differences in the success of the improvement principles used by organisations in order to inform archetypes of process improvement. Overall, our findings suggest that process improvement is determined through the application of two foundational principles combined with one of four archetypes. 'Remove non-value-adding tasks' and 're-sequence tasks' are described as foundational principles of process improvement, whilst outsourcing needs to be approached with caution. Furthermore, we articulate four distinctive archetypes comprising unique configurations of improvement principles that can be used to redesign operational processes. Based on this evidence we propose a typology of process improvement. This work suggests that rather than adopting generic improvement frameworks, managers should consult the typology to determine the archetype in closest proximity to their specific requirements. This study has several limitations including the small number of items populating the concourse and the fact that implementation problems are not taken into account.

The Role of Process Innovation between Firm-Specific Capabilities and Sustainable Innovation in SMEs: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia

“…However, the general practices of each firm are not the same, and one practice may succeed in a firm, but not in others. Thus, this study is looking for practices that can be generalized to others, particularly in SMEs, and the practices of Ponsignon et al [121] are utilized as being effective for other firms. To enable these practices for the desired result, a driver is needed within an organization that can be relied on to activate and deploy resources within the capacity of the firm [122,123].…”

“…Process innovation as a mediating variable was measured by four items that were adapted from Ponsignon et al [121] to capture the changing of manufacturing practices or determine whether SMEs conduct process innovation by changing as an inherent added value that is not new in the industry, but new in the firm regarding the improvement of the operational process.…”

“…A dependent variable of sustainable innovation was measured by a 13-item scale to capture the impact of innovation integrally within the performance of sustainable economic (three items), environmental (five) items), and social (five items) development goals in SMEs, as adapted from Ponsignon et al [121] and Zhu and Sarkis [190].…”

IT professionals' person–organization fit with IT training and development priorities

“…A tutorial on the use of q-sorting (Thomas & Watson, 2002) illustrated the procedure by obtaining Q-sorts on MIS faculty beliefs about how to train MIS Ph.D. students. Q methodology has also been used to examine competencies of software engineers (Turley & Bieman, 1995), organizational subcultures and their relationship to DSS user satisfaction (Kendall et al, 1987), process improvement (Ponsignon et al, 2014), search engine interface development (Meloche & Cheng, 2005), wiki development (Hasan et al, 2007) and the effective use of metaphors in the language of systems development (Kendall & Kendall, 1993).…”

Evaluation of orientation on performances and process improvements in manufacturing organizations

“…Na osnovu toga, unapređenje procesa postaje vežba u optimizaciji efektivosti i efikasnosti uz poboljšanje kontrole procesa i jačanje unutrašnjih mehanizama za adekvatnu reakciju na promene zahteva klijenata [13]. Ponsignon i saradnici [14] kao osnovne principe poboljšanja procesa navode uklanjanje zadataka koji ne doprinose dodatnoj vrednosti i zadatke koji se ponavljaju. Mast i saradnici [15] razlikuju dva tipa poboljšanja procesa: stabilizacija, koja označava da je proces doveden u stanje statističke kontrole pomoću aktivnosti eliminacije i prevencije poremećaja, što je opisano i kao "fiksiranje procesa", i optimizacija, prilikom koje se parametri procesa menjaju kako bi se njegovo ponašanje poboljšalo.…”