2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fragmentation cross sections of Fe26+, Si14+ and C6+ ions of 0.3–10 on polyethylene, CR39 and aluminum targets

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measured cross-section was reasonably comparable with the results in Ref. [25]. The present result is more accurate in comparison to other measurements [25]; this is because the counting of tracks is, by the new system of analysis, more accurate.…”
Section: Total Charge Changing Cross-sectionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measured cross-section was reasonably comparable with the results in Ref. [25]. The present result is more accurate in comparison to other measurements [25]; this is because the counting of tracks is, by the new system of analysis, more accurate.…”
Section: Total Charge Changing Cross-sectionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[25] if the thickness of the target is small compared to the mean free path of the fragments and there is no fragmentation before the target. If there are some fragmentations before the target, the partial charge changing cross-section is calculated via the relation [25,33] …”
Section: Partial Charge Changing Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, EPAX2 and EPAX3 show rather good overall agreements, though EPAX2 overestimates the production of 46 Pd isotopes, EPAX3 underestimates neutron-rich isotopes of 49 In, and both underestimate 51 Sb isotopes. Finally, G4-BIN, which shows the best performance for other cases, is also found to overestimate the productions of 46 Pd, 47 Ag, and 48 Cd isotopes by K 10 2 . Such overestimation of the production cross sections needs to be ultimately resolved by improving the hadronic models, but it is beyond the scope of this work.…”
Section: Benchmark Test Of Simulation Methods For the Production Crosmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…5 we have plotted experimental production cross sections of 46 Pd $ 50 Sn isotopes for 132 Sn [10], 136 Xe [38][39][40] and 238 U [41][42][43] beams. The experimental cross sections are nearly independent of the incident beam energies [18,26,35,[44][45][46][47]38]. It is clearly seen that the cross sections are mainly characterized by the species of the incident beams, and the energy-dependence is rather weak.…”
Section: Benchmark Test Of Simulation Methods For the Production Crosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The REL may be determined from the geometry of the etched cones. For CR39 this technique is particularly successful, yielding measurements of the electric charge of heavy relativistic nuclei (Z > 5) to a precision of 0.05e if several layers of plastic sheets are used [39,40].…”
Section: Energy Loss Mechanisms In Nuclear Track Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%