Frailty prevalence and efficient screening in primary care-based memory clinics

Abstract

Background Little is known about the prevalence of frailty among patients with memory concerns attending a primary care-based memory clinic. Objective This study aims to describe the prevalence of frailty among patients attending a primary care-based memory clinic and to determine if prevalence rates differ based on the screening tool that is used. Methods We conducted a retrospective medical record review for all consecutive patients assessed in a primary care-based memory clinic over 8 months. Frailty was measured in 258 patients using the Fried frailty criteria, which relies on physical measures, and the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), which relies on functional status. Weighted kappa statistics were calculated to compare the Fried frailty and the CFS. Results The prevalence of frailty was 16% by Fried criteria and 48% by the CFS. Agreement between Fried frailty and CFS was fair for CFS 5+ (kappa = 0.22; 95% confidence interval: 0.13, 0.32) and moderate for CFS 6+ (kappa = 0.47; 0.34, 0.61). Dual-trait measures of hand grip strength with gait speed were found to be a valid proxy for Fried frailty phenotype. Conclusions Among primary care patients with memory concerns, frailty prevalence rates differed based on the measure used. Screening for frailty in this population using measures relying on physical performance may be a more efficient approach for persons already at risk of further health instability from cognitive impairment. Our findings demonstrate how measure selection should be based on the objectives and context in which frailty screening occurs.

Validation of Cognitive Impairment in Combination With Physical Frailty as a Predictor of Mortality in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure Referred for Heart Transplantation

“…As grip strength and walking speed have been proposed as single-item measures of frailty, 7,8,13-15 we also assessed the prognostic significance of reduced grip strength and slowed walking speed in our cohort.…”

Alzheimer's disease with frailty: Prevalence, screening, assessment, intervention strategies and challenges

“…Their findings showcased a frailty prevalence of 16% based on Fried's criteria and an elevated 48% according to the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). The collective findings of the aforementioned epidemiological investigations underscore the substantial prevalence of AD accompanied by frailty (11). Kasajima et al harnessed a microsimulation methodology to forecast the prevalence and economic implications of dementia and frailty among the population aged 60 years and above in Japan from 2016 to 2043.…”

Nutrition Status Plays a Partial Mediation Role in the Relationship between Number of Teeth and Frailty: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study

“…Minor external stimulation can cause negative clinical events among the frail elderly [3]. The prevalence of frailty varies widely between studies depending on the different assessment scales and study populations, with the prevalence of frailty increasing with aging [4]. Most studies used the diagnostic criteria developed by Fried. The literature shows that the prevalence of frailty is 6% in the elderly aged over 65 years old, 20% in the elderly aged over 80 years old, and 30-40% in the elderly aged over 90 years old [5].…”