Framework for spectrum authorization elements and its application to 5G micro-operators

Manosha, K. B. Shashika; Matinmikko-Blue, Marja

doi:10.1109/ctte.2017.8260941

Cited by 13 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The regulatory body is considered as the decision making body, who would be authorizing the NHN business [16], [17]. The interactions between InP and MNOs can be modelled using game theory model as cooperative games.…”

Section: System Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Business model for rural connectivity using multi-tenancy 5G network slicing

Kumar

Stewart

Crawford

et al. 2020

2020 IEEE 17th International Conference on Smart Communities: Improving Quality of Life Using ICT, IoT and AI (HONET)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rural areas are often neglected while deploying newer mobile technologies. Hence, these place are digitally disconnected from the world. To overcome this challenge, 5G network slicing supporting multi-tenancy, also known as neutral host network, is studied to improve rural connectivity. The infrastructure provider (InP) deploys the rural 5G network and mobile network operators (MNOs) lease the slices from InP to serve their end-users. This aims to study the value network configuration (VNC) for the 5G network slicing architecture to understand the possible business model. As a result, three configurations are defined driven by micro-operator, MNO and community endusers respectively. The business models are constructed using SWOT analysis and business canvas models. The revenue streams for the proposed rural network are analyzed.Index Terms-neutral host network, infrastructure provider, 5G, mobile network operators, network slicing TABLE III BUSINESS CANVAS MODEL FOR 5G NHN

show abstract

Section: System Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Business model for rural connectivity using multi-tenancy 5G network slicing

Kumar

Stewart

Crawford

et al. 2020

2020 IEEE 17th International Conference on Smart Communities: Improving Quality of Life Using ICT, IoT and AI (HONET)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Spectrum flexibility and spectrum sharing have not been accommodated in the Indonesian spectrum usage fee; this would permit allotment such that the available spectrum's efficiency would be maximized, which is especially of interest regarding rural areas [29].…”

Section: Lack Of Incentive For Spectrum Sharingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This does not accommodate a large amount of local private operators. Therefore, there is a a demand for a new spectrum authorization design that permits new private operators to participate in 5G [29].…”

Section: No Regulation Of Private 5g Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

On Developing a New 5G Spectrum Usage Fee Model for Indonesia

Hikmaturokhman¹,

Ramli²,

Suryanegara³

2019

Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports on the development of the 5G spectrum usage fee in Indonesia. The fee was first applied in 2010 to charge mobile network operators (MNOs) that provided cellular services. However, cellular technologies have improved rapidly from 2G, 3G, 4G to 5G, and many modern innovative cellular services demand larger spectrum bandwidth. Therefore, the existing spectrum usage fee must be revised to meet the needs of the community better and to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of spectrum use. This study modifies the characteristics of the existing cost structure of the Indonesian spectrum usage fee, designing and proposing a new 5G spectrum usage fee model to support 5G technology usage scenarios and maximize the benefits of the midband (3.5 GHz), mmWave, or high band radio frequencies (26 GHz and 28 GHz). The new spectrum usage fee model includes spectrum-sharing parameters (non-orthogonal spectrum-sharing and orthogonal spectrum sharing) and private network to optimize the use of the available spectrum because the new proposing formula does not use the nationwide population, but instead, it uses the population within a specific area with both human and non-human (machine) populations. This new model is expected to help regulators prepare 5G technology regulations for application in Indonesia.

show abstract

“…As the micro-operators are expected to provide versatile high-quality services, their operations is crucially dependent on local access to the spectrum with no or very limited harmful interference. Some regulators are in the process of defining local licensing models discussed in [8] for assigning local access rights [9] with an appropriate spectrum authorization framework [10]. On the other hand, the harmful interference between two micro-operators can also be avoided by using an appropriate separation distance between them [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the Performance of Alternative 5G Micro-Operator Deployments in 3.6 GHz and 26 GHz Bands

Manosha

Hiltunen

Matinmikko-Blue

2019

2019 16th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The fifth generation (5G) networks will increasingly target specific indoor deployments such as closed factory premises or open shopping malls for local providing of highquality services. Local 5G network operator models, such as the newly proposed micro-operators, have gained increasing interest with guaranteed quality-of-service delivery, in spatially confined areas, especially inside the buildings. However, establishing local 5G networks with quality guarantees requires local spectrum access rights which are in the agendas of many national regulators. In this paper, we study the feasibility of indoor deployment of local 5G networks in two new 5G bands including 3.6 GHz and 26 GHz. We consider different deployment alternatives for a local 5G micro-operator in the bands with different antenna configurations and network densities. Then, we evaluate the impact of the different deployments on the performance of users via system level simulations of the average and celledge throughputs in downlink and uplink. Numerically, we have observed that the performance achieved in these two bands can be improved by increasing the base station (BS) density of the network. Furthermore, we have seen that the centre frequency does not significantly impact on the downlink performance unless the network is noise-limited. However, the uplink performance in the 26 GHz band is affected by the higher coupling losses between the BSs and the mobile terminals. We have also noticed that beamforming and wider channel bandwidths are useful for improving the network performance in 26 GHz band.

show abstract

Framework for spectrum authorization elements and its application to 5G micro-operators

Cited by 13 publications

References 10 publications

Business model for rural connectivity using multi-tenancy 5G network slicing

Business model for rural connectivity using multi-tenancy 5G network slicing

On Developing a New 5G Spectrum Usage Fee Model for Indonesia

On the Performance of Alternative 5G Micro-Operator Deployments in 3.6 GHz and 26 GHz Bands

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About