2013
DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2013.848222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing Environmental Risks and Natural Disasters in Factual Entertainment Television

Abstract: Abstract:This article examines the framing of environmental risks and natural disasters in factual entertainment television programs of the early 2000s, a hybrid form combining techniques from documentary with techniques such as dramatic reconstructions and computer generated imagery from entertainment genres. Using qualitative frame analysis, the article examines a range of factual entertainment television programs' framing of environmental risk and natural disasters in terms of their attitudes, representatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of media in environmental, environmental controversy, and public health risk news has received considerable recent scholarly attention (e.g., Russill, 2008; Russill & Nyssa, 2009; Peeples & Depoe, 2014; DeLuca & Peeples, 2002; Campbell, 2014; Shehata & Hopmann, 2012; Morgan, Larkin, & Adams, 2011). For example, past research has examined media and rhetoric involving environmental issues (Peeples, 2005; Peeples, 2011; Peeples et al, 2014).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of media in environmental, environmental controversy, and public health risk news has received considerable recent scholarly attention (e.g., Russill, 2008; Russill & Nyssa, 2009; Peeples & Depoe, 2014; DeLuca & Peeples, 2002; Campbell, 2014; Shehata & Hopmann, 2012; Morgan, Larkin, & Adams, 2011). For example, past research has examined media and rhetoric involving environmental issues (Peeples, 2005; Peeples, 2011; Peeples et al, 2014).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such framing strategies need to emphasise human agency (e.g. the relationship between personal or government responsibility and habitat loss/protection) to be effective in the context of environmental advocacy (Campbell 2014).…”
Section: Effective and Affective Framing Of Threatened Bird Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Documentaries, a second area noted as under-researched (Campbell, 2014)  Visual imagery. As noted in Hay and Eagle (2016), the choice of images used as part of communication has significant impact on engagement with issues, with the link between imagery and communications framing being noted (Geise and Baden, 2015) but under-researched in the environmental context (Hansen and Machin, 2013).…”
Section: Directions For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%