2008
DOI: 10.1093/sp/jxn001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing Gender Equality in the European Union Political Discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
52
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Because poor male employment prospects and high rates of relationship breakdown make large families and a rigid gendered division of labor risky, particularly for women who have specialized in unpaid work and care in the private sphere (Oppenheimer, 1997;SigleRushton, 2010), greater female labor force participation also offered a solution to some of the new risks that individuals were confronting as a consequence of social and family change. Although embracing this strategy required a rather dramatic ideological shift for some (particularly Continental European) countries, increased female employment resonated with a Scandinavian-inspired (Duncan, 2002) but somewhat instrumental approach to the promotion of gender equality (Lewis 2006;Lombardo & Meier, 2008).…”
Section: Sustainability Of Male Breadwinner Welfare Systems Challengedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because poor male employment prospects and high rates of relationship breakdown make large families and a rigid gendered division of labor risky, particularly for women who have specialized in unpaid work and care in the private sphere (Oppenheimer, 1997;SigleRushton, 2010), greater female labor force participation also offered a solution to some of the new risks that individuals were confronting as a consequence of social and family change. Although embracing this strategy required a rather dramatic ideological shift for some (particularly Continental European) countries, increased female employment resonated with a Scandinavian-inspired (Duncan, 2002) but somewhat instrumental approach to the promotion of gender equality (Lewis 2006;Lombardo & Meier, 2008).…”
Section: Sustainability Of Male Breadwinner Welfare Systems Challengedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Par ailleurs, il est essentiel que les questions de genre dans chaque ministère ne soient pas confiées à des personnes peu expérimentées ou employées à court terme (Daly 2005;Jacquot 2010;Pollack et Hafner-Burton 2000;Stratigaki 2005). Plus largement, la littérature sur l'égalité de genre et sur les violences faites aux femmes révèle le rôle déterminant que tient la participation des organisations de la société civile et des voix marginalisées à l'élaboration et à la mise en oeuvre de la politique dans la réalisation de ces objectifs (Krizsan et Lombardo 2013;Krizsan et Popa 2014;Lombardo et Meier 2008;Merry 2009;Montoya 2013;Verloo 2007;Verloo et Lombardo 2007;Walby, Armstrong, et Strid 2012). Toutefois, pour ce qui est de la France, cette participation serait encore loin d'être systématique et efficace.…”
Section: Politique Relative Aux Violences Conjugales : Prévention Et unclassified
“…3 Among many others, it is worthy to mention existing studies about the EU's anti-trafficking policy, such as Susanne Baer's criticism of EU policy on sexual harassment and pornography (Baer, 1996), Marjan Wijer's analysis of the EU approach to prostitution (Wijers, 2000), or Dorchen Leidholdt's essay on sexual trafficking in the EU (Leidholdt, 1996). In terms of critiquing the epistemological framework of EU methods and tools applied to attain gender mainstreaming, it is worthy to mention Emanuela Lombardo's and Petra Meier's essay on framing gender in the EU public policy (Lombardo and Meier, 2008), Vivien Schmidt's and Claudio Radaelli's study on policy change and European discourse (Schmidt and Radaelli, 2004), or Rijken and Volder's essay on human rights approach in EU policy on trafficking of human beings (Rijken and Volder, 2009). gender mainstreaming as a tool used in EU equality policy. In this article, we argue in favour of Emanuela Lombardo and Petra Meier's critical approach to the EU's gender mainstreaming policy (Lombardo and Meier, 2006;Lombardo and Meier, 2006;and Lombardo, 2013), which is based on the assumption that the current methodological baseline for this approach lacks consistency and is not compatible with its aim construed by the Beijing Platform of the United Nations (UN).…”
Section: Constructivist Theories On European Integration and Europeanmentioning
confidence: 99%