2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11077-018-9336-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Framing morality policy issues: state legislative debates on abortion restrictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One central finding from this stream of research is that the strength of this connection varies across citizens and issues (Ryan, 2014: 381). As a corollary, political actors can strategically appeal to divergent moral intuitions in their framing (Clifford et al, 2015) or even choose to discuss a putative morality issue in language that plays down questions of morality (Mucciaroni et al, 2019). Accordingly, the focus is on micro-level processes of opinion formation, and occasionally on the meso-level attempts to shape these.…”
Section: Morality Policy Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One central finding from this stream of research is that the strength of this connection varies across citizens and issues (Ryan, 2014: 381). As a corollary, political actors can strategically appeal to divergent moral intuitions in their framing (Clifford et al, 2015) or even choose to discuss a putative morality issue in language that plays down questions of morality (Mucciaroni et al, 2019). Accordingly, the focus is on micro-level processes of opinion formation, and occasionally on the meso-level attempts to shape these.…”
Section: Morality Policy Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por último, como ya se anticipó, es importante no desconocer que la enmarcación pública de un problema suele formar parte de una agencia estratégica. Como apuntan Mucciaroni et al (2019), los actores se enfrentan a una diversidad de decisiones a la hora de presentar su concepción de un asunto problematizado, evaluando alternativamente la conveniencia de utilizar una o más enmarcaciones, la pertinencia de apelar a un encuadre conciliador o uno divergente y la efectividad de cada marco argumentativo para conseguir la mayor influencia. Simultáneamente, el resultado de estas ponderaciones tiende a estar sujeto a una importante variación en función del contexto espacial y temporal de pronunciación.…”
Section: Enfoque Conceptualunclassified
“…First, the idea of strategic emphasis on morality implies that elites can (try to) shape public attitudes on and perceptions of policies for their own gains (see e.g. Mucciaroni, Ferraiolo, and Rubado 2019).…”
Section: Public Opinion On Morality Issues and The Problem Of Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%