2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Free radical scavenging activity of a novel antioxidative peptide purified from hydrolysate of bullfrog skin, Rana catesbeiana Shaw

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
229
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
11
229
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent of protein degradation by proteolytic enzymes was usually estimated by assessing the degree of hydrolysis (Hou et al, 2011;Qian et al, 2008). As shown in Figure 2(A), there were significant differences in DH among hydrolysates obtained with various proteases, in decreasing order of trypsin > alcalase > flavourzyme > papain > neutrase > pepsin > bromelain (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Effect Of Enzyme Type On the Properties Of Hydrolysatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent of protein degradation by proteolytic enzymes was usually estimated by assessing the degree of hydrolysis (Hou et al, 2011;Qian et al, 2008). As shown in Figure 2(A), there were significant differences in DH among hydrolysates obtained with various proteases, in decreasing order of trypsin > alcalase > flavourzyme > papain > neutrase > pepsin > bromelain (p < 0.05).…”
Section: Effect Of Enzyme Type On the Properties Of Hydrolysatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in size, amount, the exposure of the terminal amino groups of the products obtained and the composition of free amino acids or small peptides affect the antioxidative activity (Thiansilakul et al 2007). Low molecular weight peptides have generally shown higher antioxidant activity (Qian et al 2008).…”
Section: Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (Orac)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a and 2a). Generally, purification of antioxidant active peptide by ion exchange is common fashion (Qian et al 2008;Nazeer 2010, 2011) and the collected fractions were concentrated and tested against DPPH radical scavenging activity (Table 2). As shown in figure, the active fraction of viscera (II -45.32±0.144) and foot (III -43.43± 0.066) was further purified using the Sephadex G-25, open column connected to FPLC (Figs.…”
Section: Purification Of Active Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%