“…In the present note we prove it in the case (p, q, r) = (3, 5, 2). In conjunction with previously known results [8,3,11,15,4,5,1,2,6,13,14,17] (see for example the survey [9] or the Introduction to [12] for details), this reduces the conjecture to the cases (p, q, r) = (2, q, 2) for q ∈ {3, 4, 5}.…”