2013
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency‐domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease—a comparison with intravascular ultrasound

Abstract: FD-OCT assessment of ULM is feasible and safe. Direct comparisons with IVUS reveal that FD-OCT achieved imaging completeness less often, whereas it was more sensitive in detecting malapposition and edge dissections, and similar to IVUS in the assessment of lumen and stent dimensions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]21 These studies, however, were limited to single center experiences with small sample sizes. Among these studies, the incidence of OCT-detected SED and instent dissection ranges widely: 15% to 37% for SED [9][10][11][12][13][14]16,21 and 44% to 98% for instent dissection.…”
Section: Incidence Of Poststent Oct Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]21 These studies, however, were limited to single center experiences with small sample sizes. Among these studies, the incidence of OCT-detected SED and instent dissection ranges widely: 15% to 37% for SED [9][10][11][12][13][14]16,21 and 44% to 98% for instent dissection.…”
Section: Incidence Of Poststent Oct Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the incidence of OCT-detected SED has been reported to be at least 2-fold higher than IVUSdetected SED. 11,12,15 Most studies, however, have not shown a correlation between OCT-detected SED and clinical events at 1 year, 10,11,13 possibly because most OCT-detected SED heal before midterm follow-up. [10][11][12][13]15 Our current study also showed no correlation between SED and clinical events at 1 year.…”
Section: Sed/instent Dissection and Clinical Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Важна возможность точной количе-ственной оценки результата стентирования, что снижает вероятные ошибки субъективного анализа. Применение оптической когерентной томографии в дополнение к преимуществам ВСУЗИ позволяет более точно оценить диаметр сосуда, а также выявить краевую диссекцию и малаппозицию после имплантации стента [44].…”
Section: чкв у пациентов с поражением ствола лкаunclassified