2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2018.11.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency vs time domain identification of heritage structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, there is a great deal of concern among researchers about historic buildings as they have a high patrimonial value. In this sense, it is worth highlighting the research carried out by Zini et al [46], in which the 'Torre Grossa' (San Gimignano, Italy) and the Mastio di Matilde (Livorno, Italy) were studied. In order to obtain a more complete structural diagnosis, it is common not only to take sensor data but also to carry out visual inspections of the structure.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is a great deal of concern among researchers about historic buildings as they have a high patrimonial value. In this sense, it is worth highlighting the research carried out by Zini et al [46], in which the 'Torre Grossa' (San Gimignano, Italy) and the Mastio di Matilde (Livorno, Italy) were studied. In order to obtain a more complete structural diagnosis, it is common not only to take sensor data but also to carry out visual inspections of the structure.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modal identification methodologies can be divided into two categories as frequency domain and time domain techniques. While a literature survey of the methodologies is out of the scope of this study, Zini et al [30] compared the frequency and time domain modal identification techniques by applying them to two historic masonry towers. The well-known Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition (EFDD) methodology was used in this study by using Artemis, Modal Analysis Software [31].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Measurements And Obtained Dynamic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…gravity loads); 6) earthquake resistant design level (mainly gravity-load design or anti-seismic design); 7) soil-structure interaction. For unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings, the fundamental period can be affected by parameters such as masonry type, regularity in plan and in elevation, geometric and mechanical parameters, which are rarely accounted for (Bayraktar et al 2015;Zini et al 2018; Spina et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%