Fri0301 do Patients and Physicians Agree on the Definition of Remission and Low Disease Activity in Axial Spondyloarthritis?

Abstract

Background:Current recommendations for axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) include the treat-to-target concept and suggest that the ideal target should be remission or low disease activity (LDA). Also, the importance of a shared decision is highlighted. Unfortunately, the definition of remission is not consensual, and most of the definitions are difficult to evaluate in clinical practiceObjectives:To propose an evaluation of remission by a single question to the patient, by comparing it to the different available definitions. To analyze the metric properties of the current definitions against patient’s perceptionMethods:One-center cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital including consecutive patients with a diagnosis of axSpA (and fulfilling the ASAS criteria) were included between February to November 2019. Patient’s perception of remission and LDA was evaluated by a single question. Physician’s perception of remission and LDA was assessed identically. The level of agreement between patients’ perception and the other available definitions was tested by the Prevalence and Bias adjusted Kappa (PABAK). The metric properties Sensitivity (S) and Specificity (Sp) of the available definitions (BASDAI cut-offs, ASDAS disease states, ASAS criteria for partial remission and patient acceptable symptom state), were tested against the patients perspective, as the gold standard.Results:A total of 105 axSpA patients were included. 63,8% were males and 67,6% had radiographic sacroiliitis (Table 1). 21% and 72% of them considered themselves in remission and LDA, respectively. Physician’s perception was 45.7% and 81% for remission and LDA, respectively. The prevalence of the different definitions are shown in Figure 1. The best agreement for patients’s perception of remission was found with a BASDAI <2 + normal CRP (Table 2). This definition was also the most sensitive (S=72,7%) and specific (Sp=83,1%) when taking the patient’s perception as a reference.Table 1.Characteristics of 105 patients with axSpAAll (N:105)Patients in self-defined REM (N:22)Patients in self-defined LDA (N:54)Patients No REM no LDA (N:29)Male, n (%)67 (63,8)18 (81,8)34 (63)15 (51,7)r-axSpA, n (%)71 (67,6)17 (77,3)33 (61,1)21 (72,4)Mean age, years (SD)49 (13)51(15)47 (13)50 (11)Mean AxSpA duration, years (SD)12,2 (13)17,1 (16,2)11,2 (11,7)10,3 (12,3)HLA- B27+, n (%)Data from 10472 (69,2)17/22 (77,3)33/54 (61,1)22/28 (78,6)Periferic arthritis, n (%)34 (32,4)7 (31,8)17 (31,5)10 (45,4)Uveitis, n (%)22 (21)6 (27,3)10 (18,5)6 (20,7)Biological treatment, n (%)43 (41)14 (63,6)19 (35,1)10 (34,5)CRP, mean (SD)3,61 (5,36)2,31 (2,17)2,84 (3,87)6,04 (8,14)ASDAS, mean (SD)1,78 (1,08)0,98 (0,71)1,63 (0,89)2,68 (1,03)BASDAI, mean (SD)3,35 (2,32)1,39 (1,30)3,13 (1,84)5,26 (2,33)BASFI, mean (SD)2,81 (2,45)1,24 (1,37)2,57 (2,00)4,43 (2,92)Table 1.REM: Remission; LDA: Low Disease Activity; SD: Standard Desviation; CRP: C-Reactive Protein IBD: Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Table 2.Agreement between different definitions of remissionASDAS <1,3BASDAI<2+Normal CRPPGA ≤1PhysicianREMPatientREMASAS PR0.53 (0.58)0.59 (0.68)0.76 (0.83)0.22 (0.26)0.39 (0.56)ASDAS <1,30.64 (0.68)0.50 (0.56)0.44 (0.45)0.28 (0.37)BASDAI <2+Normal CRP0.60 (0.69)0.25 (0.28)0.50 (0.62)PGA ≤10.20 (0.24)0.42 (0.62)Physician REM0.20 (0.24)Agreement is presented as Cohen’s Kappa (PABAK: prevalence and bias adjusted kappa).Patient and Physician remission (REM) are based on the single question; ASAS PR:ASAS partial remission; PGA: Patient global assessment.Conclusion:In this real-life population, the evaluation of remission by the patient through a single question was shown to be feasible and to present an acceptable agreement with other definitions.References:[1]Gorlier C, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78(2):201-8.Fig. 1.REM/LDA: remission/ low disease activity self-defined patient or physician through a simple question. ASDAS <1,3: inactive disease; ASDAS <2,1: low activity; PGA: Patient global assessment; PASS: Patient acceptable symptom state.Acknowledgments:To Ansgar Seyfferth and Alfonso Muriel. To Carlos Sanchez-Piedra, Fernando Alonso and Mercedes Guerra from Sociedad Española de Reumatología, Research Unit.Disclosure of Interests:Marta Valero Grant/research support from: Novartis, Pfizer, Abvie, Speakers bureau: Novartis, Celgene, Javier Bachiller-Corral: None declared, Boris Anthony Blanco Cáceres: None declared, M. Ángeles Blázquez: None declared, Consuelo Díaz-Miguel: None declared, Maria Jesus Garcia Villanueva: None declared, Carmen Larena: None declared, Jose Luis Morell Hita: None declared, Carlos De la Puente Bujidos: None declared, Ana Rodriguez-García: None declared, Mónica Vázquez Díaz: None declared, Anna Moltó Grant/research support from: Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB