‘Friendly allies in raising a child’: a survey of men and women seeking elective co-parenting arrangements via an online connection website

Abstract

STUDY QUESTIONWhat are the characteristics, motivations and expectations of men and women who search for a co-parent online?SUMMARY ANSWERMale and female prospective co-parents differed in terms of their motivations, choice of co-parent and expectations of co-parenting, while differences according to sexual orientation were less marked.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADYVery few studies have addressed the experiences of elective co-parents, i.e. men and women who are not in a relationship with each other creating and raising a child together. No study has examined the motivations and experiences of those who seek co-parents online.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATIONAn online survey was completed by 102 participants (61 men, 41 women) who were members of Pride Angel, an online connection website that facilitates contact between people looking for someone with whom to have a child. The survey was live for 7 weeks.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODSDetails of the survey were emailed to all members of Pride Angel. The survey obtained data on participants' demographic characteristics, motivations, choice of co-parent and expectations of co-parenting. Data were analysed to examine differences by gender and by sexual orientation within each gender.MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCEApproximately one-third of men and one half of women seeking co-parenting arrangements were heterosexual. The majority (69, 68%) of participants were single, although significantly more gay and bisexual men (15, 36%) and lesbian and bisexual women (11, 55%) had a partner compared with heterosexual men (4, 20%) and heterosexual women (2, 12%), respectively. Overall, the most important motivation for seeking co-parenting arrangements was in order for both biological parents to be involved in the child's upbringing. Co-parents were looking for someone with a good medical history. Most female co-parents expected the child to live with them, whereas male co-parents either wished the child to reside with the mother or to live equally in both households. A higher proportion of gay and bisexual men than heterosexual men wanted daily contact with the child.LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTIONAlthough this study presents data from the largest sample of elective co-parents to date, the main limitations were the low response rate and that only members of one website were approached. The findings may not be representative of all potential elective co-parents.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGSThis study provides important insights into the new phenomenon of elective co-parenting. With the increasing use of assisted reproductive technologies and the diversification of family forms, a growing number of people are seeking co-parenting arrangements to have children. While up until now, elective co-parenting has been principally associated with the gay and lesbian community, this study shows that, with the rise of co-parenting websites, increasing numbers of heterosexual men and women are seeking these types of parenting arrangements. This study generates the first findings on ...

Co-parenting arrangements in lesbian and gay families: when the ‘mum and dad’ ideal generates innovative family forms

“…This was also the main motivation given by prospective gay and lesbian co-parents in other national contexts (Erera and Segal-Engelchin, 2014;Jadva et al, 2015). Finding a "known donor" or an "accessible surrogate" who could supply the child with information about origins was not sufficient.…”

“…both biological parents and their partners. 2 While co-parenting appears an increasingly common way for lesbian and gay individuals or couples to become parents (Cadoret, 2002;Jadva et al, 2015;Lewin, 2009;Weeks et al, 2001), research is still limited on this topic. An analysis of co-parenting arrangements offers an opportunity to understand the motivations and desires which shape such apparently novel and subversive multi-parental family formations.…”

Un/familiar connections: on the relevance of a sociology of personal life for exploring egg and sperm donation

“…In such arrangements, donors and prospective parents negotiate for themselves the relationship that exists among the recipient parents, the donor and the child/ren (e.g. Jadva et al 2015, Nordqvist 2011.…”

The end of donor anonymity: how genetic testing is likely to drive anonymous gamete donation out of business

“…However, many other models exist and meeting a sperm donor or buying sperm directly on the Internet is a growing business. In many cases, this is done as a single transaction, although it can also be part of a co-parenting agreement, where parents who are not in a relationship work together to have a child (Jadva et al, 2015).…”