2015
DOI: 10.25300/misq/2015/39.3.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friendship in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending: Pipes, Prisms, and Relational Herding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
54
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, investors are motivated to support or help creators, gain or collect rewards, and become members of a community [47][48][49][50]. In addition, many scholars have also investigated the behavior of investors, such as the herding effect and the bystander effect [50][51][52]. In the early stage of financing, investors are more likely to follow the trend to invest in projects, and the herding effect is significant.…”
Section: Crowdfunding and Reward-based Crowdfundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, investors are motivated to support or help creators, gain or collect rewards, and become members of a community [47][48][49][50]. In addition, many scholars have also investigated the behavior of investors, such as the herding effect and the bystander effect [50][51][52]. In the early stage of financing, investors are more likely to follow the trend to invest in projects, and the herding effect is significant.…”
Section: Crowdfunding and Reward-based Crowdfundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, there is empirical evidence to support the features of Phase III. Colombo et al (2015) argued that a sufficient amount of early contributions in a reward crowdfunding campaign can trigger a self-reinforcing mechanism, thereby accelerating the accumulation of total funding, while the previous investments lead to herding behaviours in lending crowdfunding campaigns (Luo and Lin, 2013;Liu et al 2015). As for equity crowdfunding, the funds raised in the early stage of crowdfunding campaigns result in an information cascade among investors, thereby increasing the chance that the project will be fully funded (Vismara, 2016b).…”
Section: Crowdfunding Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between Phase II and III is that investors are motivated to follow other investors' decisions instead of evaluating the quality of projects. The funding accumulated in the earlier stages attracts a large number of investors by enhancing collective intelligence (Yum et al 2012), reducing uncertainty (Colombo et al 2015); causing information cascades (Vismara 2016b); and leading to herding behaviours (Liu et al 2015;Mohammadi and Shafi 2018). The selfreinforcing mechanism is triggered by the fact that members in the virtual communities affect others' decision-making.…”
Section: Crowdfunding Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Friendships increase the probability of successful funding, lower interest rates on funded loans. Liu et al [6]; Faia and Paiella [7] also encountered in the literature. Duarte et al [8] studied the role of appearance in peer-to-peer lending and argued that borrowers who appear more trustworthy have higher probabilities of having their loans funded.…”
Section: P2p Lendingmentioning
confidence: 99%