2018
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From ERPs to MVPA Using the Amsterdam Decoding and Modeling Toolbox (ADAM)

Abstract: In recent years, time-resolved multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) has gained much popularity in the analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. However, MVPA may appear daunting to those who have been applying traditional analyses using event-related potentials (ERPs) or event-related fields (ERFs). To ease this transition, we recently developed the Amsterdam Decoding and Modeling (ADAM) toolbox in MATLAB. ADAM is an entry-level toolbox that allows a direct comparison of E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
180
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
180
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the ADAM toolbox (Fahrenfort, van Driel, van Gaal, & Olivers, 2018), we applied a classification algorithm to high-pass filtered data (0.5 Hz) for each participant using 10-fold cross validation. Using all electrodes, each dataset was split into 10 equally sized subsets.…”
Section: Frequency Taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the ADAM toolbox (Fahrenfort, van Driel, van Gaal, & Olivers, 2018), we applied a classification algorithm to high-pass filtered data (0.5 Hz) for each participant using 10-fold cross validation. Using all electrodes, each dataset was split into 10 equally sized subsets.…”
Section: Frequency Taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Figure 3). The ADAM-toolbox 632 was used on the Broadband and Rhythmic PSC time-courses with epochs from -100 ms to 400 ms 633 (Fahrenfort et al, 2018). Crucially, and for each individual component, we trained a linear discriminant 634 (LDA) classifier in one monkey and tested in a separate monkey for obtaining cross-individual 635 decodability of stimuli expectancy category, i.e.…”
Section: Cross-individual Decoding 628 629mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall classification 25 accuracy was the average accuracy of these 99 iterations. Moreover, we used a balanced accuracy 26 calculation as described in Fahrenfort et al (2018), where accuracy is calculated separated per 27 class and then averaged across classes. 28…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%