2021
DOI: 10.1080/1369183x.2020.1866978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From illegalised migrant toward permanent resident: assembling precarious legal status trajectories and differential inclusion in Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…employer or spouse), or not having access to services granted to permanent residents, such as education or health coverage (Goldring et al, 2009 , 241). However, it is not a fixed position because migrants, depending on their variable capacities to meet the immigration conditions, can “climb the ladders” by gaining a more secure status or can experience chutes into more precarity (Landolt & Goldring, 2013 , 15; Goldring & Landolt, 2021 ). Legal status categories also condition the integration of migrant workers into the labour market.…”
Section: Youth Mobility Temporariness and Precaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…employer or spouse), or not having access to services granted to permanent residents, such as education or health coverage (Goldring et al, 2009 , 241). However, it is not a fixed position because migrants, depending on their variable capacities to meet the immigration conditions, can “climb the ladders” by gaining a more secure status or can experience chutes into more precarity (Landolt & Goldring, 2013 , 15; Goldring & Landolt, 2021 ). Legal status categories also condition the integration of migrant workers into the labour market.…”
Section: Youth Mobility Temporariness and Precaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This imbalance illustrates how state policies produce a “temporary-permanent divide” (Rajkumar et al, 2012 ) between migrant workers of a same entry category. At one end of the spectrum, there are workers with a temporarily temporary status because their conditions of residence allow them to “climb the ladders” (Goldring & Landolt, 2013 , 2021 ) towards a more secure status by gaining PR. At the other end, we find IEC workers with more restrictive conditions of residence, which place them into the precarious position of being permanently temporary in Canada.…”
Section: Uneven Transitions To Permanent Residencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honduras "mimicked" Salvadorean admissions to Canada. 10 Some Canadian scholars suggest that many immigrants of the fifth wave who later regularize their status (precarious to non-precarious) may be part of the non-permanent resident pool of previous years (Goldring and Landolt, 2021). The case of Mexican agricultural workers has been, perhaps, one of the most studied (McLauglin and Hennebry, 2013;Basok et.…”
Section: Immigrant Waves Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Under the differential inclusion theoretical framework and using samples of Latino and Caribbean workers living in Toronto, Goldring and Landolt (2021) have carried out interesting work in this regard .…”
Section: Immigrant Waves Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation