2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From mini-cone test to Abrams cone test: measurement of cement-based materials yield stress using slump tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
102
1
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 342 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
102
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In the concrete industry, the yield stress is very important since it determines whether air bubbles will rise to the surface or remain trapped in the wet cement and weaken the resulting hardened material. Consequently, a large number of tests have been developed to determine the yield stress of cement and similar materials (Asaga & Roy 1980;Tremblay et al 2001;Roussel et al 2005). However, the different tests often give very different results and even in controlled rheology experiments the same problem is well documented: depending on the measurement geometry and the detailed experimental protocol, very different values of the yield stress can be found (James et al 1987;Nguyen & Boger 1992;Barnes 1997Barnes , 1999Barnes & Nguyen 2001).…”
Section: Introduction: the Yield Stress Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the concrete industry, the yield stress is very important since it determines whether air bubbles will rise to the surface or remain trapped in the wet cement and weaken the resulting hardened material. Consequently, a large number of tests have been developed to determine the yield stress of cement and similar materials (Asaga & Roy 1980;Tremblay et al 2001;Roussel et al 2005). However, the different tests often give very different results and even in controlled rheology experiments the same problem is well documented: depending on the measurement geometry and the detailed experimental protocol, very different values of the yield stress can be found (James et al 1987;Nguyen & Boger 1992;Barnes 1997Barnes , 1999Barnes & Nguyen 2001).…”
Section: Introduction: the Yield Stress Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 could systematically overestimate the results compared with those measured by the viscometer. However, Roussel et al [27] reported that the surface tension effect in the mini-slump test is negligible in pastes with yield stresses larger than about 1 Pa, which is the case for all pastes studied here.…”
Section: The Influences Of MIX Design Parametersmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This could be attributed to the fact that the effect of the surface tension of the paste was not included in Eq. 2; this would normally be of the same order as the yield stress (1-2 Pa) for low concentration suspensions [27]. The neglect of surface tension effects in the calculation of yield stress using Eq.…”
Section: The Influences Of MIX Design Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dessa forma, existem estudos que mensuram os parâmetros reológicos por meio de um reômetro para concreto [51][52][53], outros estudos medem os parâmetros reológicos da argamassa que compõe o concreto [35,36,55] e, por fim, existem modelos matemáticos que estimam os parâmetros reológicos da argamassa e do concreto por meio de parâmetros de autoadensabilidade [20,56,57].…”
Section: Aspectos Relevantes De Autoadensabilidade E De Reologia De Aunclassified