From Novelty to Normalization? How Journalists Use the Term “Fake News” in their Reporting

Abstract

During recent years, worries about fake news have been a salient aspect of mediated debates. However, the ubiquitous and fuzzy usage of the term in news reporting has led more and more scholars and other public actors to call for its abandonment in public discourse altogether. Given this status as a controversial but arguably effective buzzword in news coverage, we know surprisingly little about exactly how journalists use the term in their reporting. By means of a quantitative content analysis, this study offers empirical evidence on this question. Using the case of Austria, where discussions around fake news have been ubiquitous during recent years, we analyzed all news articles mentioning the term "fake news" in major daily newspapers between 2015 and 2018 (N = 2,967). We find that journalistic reporting on fake news shifts over time from mainly describing the threat of disinformation online, to a more normalized and broad usage of the term in relation to attacks on legacy news media. Furthermore, news reports increasingly use the term in contexts completely unrelated to disinformation or media attacks. In using the term this way, journalists arguably contribute not only to term salience but also to a questionable normalization process.

The Austrian Corona Panel Project: monitoring individual and societal dynamics amidst the COVID-19 crisis

“…the uncontrolled spread of false or misleading information about the virus, which might lead to different levels of COVID-19 concern in the population” (WHO 2020 ). In such instances international research points to professional journalism and especially a strong public broadcasting service as an essential corrective (Egelhofer et al 2020 ; Humprecht et al 2020 ).…”

Four years of fake news: A quantitative analysis of the scientific literature

“…Since the 2016 American Presidential election, "Fake News" has become the catchall buzzword for everything related to online misinformation and disinformation, both in journalistic and political discourse (Egelhofer and Lechele, 2019;Egelhofer et al, 2020;Farkas and Schou, 2018), and scholarly research. Defined as "fabricated information that mimics news media content in form but not in organizational process or intent" (Lazer et al, 2018(Lazer et al, , p. 1094 or "news articles that are intentionally and verifiably false, and could mislead readers" (Allcott and Gentzkow, 2017, p. 213), this word has raised noticeable debate among scholars.…”

Official Truths in a War on Fake News: Governmental Fact-Checking in Malaysia, Singapore, and Thailand

“…Over the past years, the literature on truth, facts, and fake has grown exponentially, with particularly high outputs after the 2016 US presidential election. Initial resistance against accepting fake news as an academic term due to its perceived imprecision (Habgood-Coote, 2019;Tandoc et al, 2018) appears to have given way to a certain normalisation (Egelhofer and Lecheler, 2019;Egelhofer et al, 2020;Pepp et al, 2019). In this article, the term fake news is understood broadly as false information, regardless of content categories, disseminators' intentions, or affected interests.…”