2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2022.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From oscillatory to non-oscillatory disturbances: A comparative review of root cause analysis methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2008) stated, Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is an analysis framework used to determine the systemic causes and prevent recurrences of adverse events. In addition, RCA is useful because RCA methods provide tools to speed up the work of the process engineer troubleshooting an abnormal situation, and the review should help in selecting appropriate methods (Lucke et al, 2022). Besides that, RCA should be done immediately.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2008) stated, Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is an analysis framework used to determine the systemic causes and prevent recurrences of adverse events. In addition, RCA is useful because RCA methods provide tools to speed up the work of the process engineer troubleshooting an abnormal situation, and the review should help in selecting appropriate methods (Lucke et al, 2022). Besides that, RCA should be done immediately.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several risk assessment methods and techniques are known in the literature. Root cause analysis (Ito et al 2022;Wen et al 2022;Lucke et al 2022) analyses the root cause of the discrepancy. A cause-and-effect diagram is another method described by authors (Decker et al 2010;Gould 1992).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latterly in 2019, Dambros et al discussed in their review paper a summary of the oscillation detection approaches used in CPM. Some other reviews were dedicated purely to stiction diagnosis techniques. , On the other hand, comparative studies were limited to a specific subfield of CPM such as the comparative analysis of three decomposition techniques by Wardana and the comparative study of selected root-cause analysis techniques by Thornhill et al and further based on the type of the fault proposed by Lucke et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other reviews were dedicated purely to stiction diagnosis techniques. 44,45 On the other hand, comparative studies were limited to a specific subfield of CPM such as the comparative analysis of three decomposition techniques by Wardana 46 and the comparative study of selected root-cause analysis techniques by Thornhill et al 47 and further based on the type of the fault proposed by Lucke et al 48 The present review paper intends to discuss different aspects of data-driven CPM in detail. At the outset, this review gives a broad overview of the possible causes of performance degradation in ICS and their impact on plant operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%