2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2023.101923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From principles to reality. FAIR implementation in the nanosafety community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may involve creating a standardized vocabulary or ontology to facilitate data integration and fairness. Strong efforts are ongoing in the field of nanosafety towards the principles of Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability (FAIR) data and their importance for modelling studies and data-driven safe and sustainable application of nano- and advanced materials [100] , [101] , [102] , [103] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may involve creating a standardized vocabulary or ontology to facilitate data integration and fairness. Strong efforts are ongoing in the field of nanosafety towards the principles of Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability (FAIR) data and their importance for modelling studies and data-driven safe and sustainable application of nano- and advanced materials [100] , [101] , [102] , [103] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, digitalization ( Krug, 2022 ) and the implementation of infrastructures for FAIR data ( Dumit et al, 2023 ) hold promise to ease the DaNa teams future work by facilitating data search by e.g., data mining tools (also involving artificial intelligence) and in general allow access to toxicity data more easily.…”
Section: The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the bright side, new research projects making use of the developing nanoinformatics infrastructure, rather than having to assign an infrastructure WP or task in each new project, would be able to focus on their vested tools and set aside some budget to contribute to the maintenance of the overall NanoCommons. Consideration is needed in the long-term to understand whether continued contribution from projects, potentially organised in bottom-up networks such as the [45,46]), some sort of non-forprofit foundation with industry contribution, a European Research Infrastructure Consortium, a mixture of all or some of these, or indeed another option that has not yet emerged is the optimal approach to sustain the community infrastructure. In any case, the acceptance, interest and willingness to use and support of the Research community will be the key for any of these options.…”
Section: Sustainability As a Community Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%