From supply chain learning to the learning supply chain: drivers, processes, complexity, trade-offs and challenges

Abstract

PurposeThe view that supply chain learning (SCL) has become a fundamental capability that supply chains must employ to innovate and improve their financial, technological, operational, environmental and social performance is widely accepted. However, the SCL phenomenon is still understudied and not fully understood by scholars, decision-makers and government representatives. This article aims to make sense of the existing literature and to identify important research directions that require further attention.Design/methodology/approachThis article reviews the diversity of SCL in the literature, proposes a typology of such a phenomenon, provides an overview of key articles in the literature and identifies a series of recommendations for the future development of the field.FindingsThis article combines two fundamental dimensions from the literature (i.e. SCL driver and SCL network) to produce a typology of four types of SCL: Captive, Consortium, Selective and Distributed.Practical implicationsThe typology proposed here offers an important framework for supply chain decision-makers to rely on when implementing SCL initiatives. The implications of each type of SCL offer a robust rationale for decision-makers to adopt the most appropriate type of SCL or combinations of SCL types, given each situation. In addition, the typology supports policy-makers in further understanding the SCL phenomenon and creating effective innovation, economic development and sustainability policies through supply chains.Originality/valueThis article offers a novel typology that the authors hope will help scholars to advance the field of SCL in order to understand this important phenomenon. There is no good/bad/better/worse SCL type in the proposed typology, but the critical element for the success of SCL efforts is the level of fit between the type of SCL, the type of knowledge to be created and diffused, and the outcome supply chains aim to achieve with that learning effort. In addition, the authors coin the construct of “the learning supply chain”, which refers to a supply chain that learns constantly by employing all four types of SCL simultaneously.

Antecedents and consequences of procurement managers' willingness to pay for sustainability: a multi-level perspective

“…The data in our study also document that ethical organizational culture does not affect WTP unless individual values are strongly developed as well. This finding thus confirms the important role that the psychological structures of individuals play in sustainable supply chains (Silvestre et al. , 2023).…”

Supply Chain Complexity and Its Impact on Knowledge Transfer: Incorporating Sustainable Supply Chain Practices in Food Supply Chain Networks

“…The learning curve of knowledge transfer has to be transmitted and embedded in the individuals working in the organisations, as it increases the importance and understanding of knowledge transfer. Silvestre et al further elaborate that the knowledge created or transferred to the key players of an organisation operating in different supply chain facilities enhances supply chain evolution, and vast improvements can be seen in the learning capacity of the individuals [87]. The results highlight that an increasing number of organisations are focusing on technological advancements to have effective communication and strategy in place for efficient supply chain systems.…”

Brilliance in resilience: operations and supply chain management’s role in achieving a sustainable future

“…The view that crises offer opportunities for learning, improvement and growth is becoming more prevalent in resilience studies (e.g. Nikookar et al ., 2021; Sauer et al ., 2022; Silva et al ., 2023; Silvestre et al ., 2023). This offers another interesting area of research in supply chain management studies within the resilience remit.…”