From the Retina to Action: Dynamics of Predictive Processing in the Visual System

Perrinet, Laurent

doi:10.5040/9781350099784.ch-005

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the last decade, the notion of PP has gained wide recognition as a model of cognitive processing applied to a variety of brain functions ( Friston, 2010 ; Clark, 2013 ; Hohwy, 2013 ; Chanes and Barrett, 2020 ; Ficco et al, 2021 ; Perrinet, 2021 ), including language production and comprehension ( Federmeier, 2007 ; Altmann and Mirković, 2009 ; Huettig, 2015 ; Lewis and Bastiaansen, 2015 ; Kuperberg and Jaeger, 2016 ; Ferreira and Qiu, 2021 ). Several aspects of the mechanism of PP have attracted the attention of researchers seeking to specify the model in more detail.…”

Section: Predictive Brainmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictive Processing in Sign Languages: A Systematic Review

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this article was to review existing research to assess the evidence for predictive processing (PP) in sign language, the conditions under which it occurs, and the effects of language mastery (sign language as a first language, sign language as a second language, bimodal bilingualism) on the neural bases of PP. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework. We searched peer-reviewed electronic databases (SCOPUS, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO host) and gray literature (dissertations in ProQuest). We also searched the reference lists of records selected for the review and forward citations to identify all relevant publications. We searched for records based on five criteria (original work, peer-reviewed, published in English, research topic related to PP or neural entrainment, and human sign language processing). To reduce the risk of bias, the remaining two authors with expertise in sign language processing and a variety of research methods reviewed the results. Disagreements were resolved through extensive discussion. In the final review, 7 records were included, of which 5 were published articles and 2 were dissertations. The reviewed records provide evidence for PP in signing populations, although the underlying mechanism in the visual modality is not clear. The reviewed studies addressed the motor simulation proposals, neural basis of PP, as well as the development of PP. All studies used dynamic sign stimuli. Most of the studies focused on semantic prediction. The question of the mechanism for the interaction between one’s sign language competence (L1 vs. L2 vs. bimodal bilingual) and PP in the manual-visual modality remains unclear, primarily due to the scarcity of participants with varying degrees of language dominance. There is a paucity of evidence for PP in sign languages, especially for frequency-based, phonetic (articulatory), and syntactic prediction. However, studies published to date indicate that Deaf native/native-like L1 signers predict linguistic information during sign language processing, suggesting that PP is an amodal property of language processing.Systematic Review Registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021238911], identifier [CRD42021238911].

show abstract