2013
DOI: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-96
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frovatriptan and Rizatriptan Economic EVAluation: the FREEVA study

Abstract: BackgroundThe present pharmacoeconomic study compared the direct and indirect costs of using frovatriptan versus rizatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine.MethodsData on the cost-efficacy of the two triptans were derived from a recently published Italian, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, cross-over patient preference study, comparing frovatriptan versus rizatriptan. The direct costs were obtained by calculating the drug consumption, both of triptans and rescue medications. Prices of currently market… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recommend caution, as this is a cross-sectional study, and longitudinal within-person acute treatment optimization and its relationship to LPT were not assessed. Results of randomized controlled trials of triptans suggest that use of effective treatments can reduce LPT 46–48 . In addition, patients who do not respond to triptans have greater losses in work productivity than triptan responders 49 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We recommend caution, as this is a cross-sectional study, and longitudinal within-person acute treatment optimization and its relationship to LPT were not assessed. Results of randomized controlled trials of triptans suggest that use of effective treatments can reduce LPT 46–48 . In addition, patients who do not respond to triptans have greater losses in work productivity than triptan responders 49 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of randomized controlled trials of triptans suggest that use of effective treatments can reduce LPT. [46][47][48] In addition, patients who do not respond to triptans have greater losses in work productivity than triptan responders. 49 Preventive treatment of migraine has also been associated with reductions in lost work productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migraine has a large economic impact on society, with two-thirds of the financial burden linked to indirect costs, such as effect on productivity at work. 48 , 49 An economical advantage of frovatriptan among the oral triptans has been suggested, with model analysis based on the human capital approach showing frovatriptan to be significantly more cost-effective than rizatriptan in particular. 49 This outcome is likely due to lower acquisition cost of frovatriptan, the need for fewer doses, and loss of fewer working hours.…”
Section: Frovatriptan In the Acute Treatment Of Migraine: Evidence Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 49 This outcome is likely due to lower acquisition cost of frovatriptan, the need for fewer doses, and loss of fewer working hours. 49 …”
Section: Frovatriptan In the Acute Treatment Of Migraine: Evidence Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 54 The need for fewer doses to treat migraine has significant personal benefits as well as being cost effective. 55 …”
Section: Frovatriptanmentioning
confidence: 99%