Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas 2012
DOI: 10.1201/b11396-166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FRP composites for seismic retrofitting of steel-concrete shear walls with steel encased profiles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental tests on BRB strengthened RC frames have been carried out. However, the BRBs were connected by means of through-anchoring, which appears to be disadvantageous as mentioned earlier [22,23]. To the extent of our knowledge, the only experiments on BRBs connected by means of post-installed anchors to RC members were reported by Yooprasertchai and Warnitchai [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental tests on BRB strengthened RC frames have been carried out. However, the BRBs were connected by means of through-anchoring, which appears to be disadvantageous as mentioned earlier [22,23]. To the extent of our knowledge, the only experiments on BRBs connected by means of post-installed anchors to RC members were reported by Yooprasertchai and Warnitchai [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test result showed that although the BRB could provide additional strength, stiffness and energy dissipation, physical damage still occurred in the weak zone of the column where lap-splices were located. Dinu et al (2012) conducted an analysis on a weak RC frame with and without BRBs. The numerical results showed that although the strengthening solution reduced the overall damage in the structure, the seismic performance of the retrofitted frame was still unsatisfactory because of plastic deformations in the columns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%