2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully Automated Pulmonary Lobar Segmentation: Influence of Different Prototype Software Programs onto Quantitative Evaluation of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

Abstract: ObjectivesSurgical or bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) techniques can be beneficial for heterogeneous emphysema. Post-processing software tools for lobar emphysema quantification are useful for patient and target lobe selection, treatment planning and post-interventional follow-up. We aimed to evaluate the inter-software variability of emphysema quantification using fully automated lobar segmentation prototypes.Material and Methods66 patients with moderate to severe COPD who underwent CT for planning… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lung and emphysema segmentation were performed calculating the ESI from clinically indicated preoperative CT scans taken with mixed technical parameters. After automated lung segmentation using the YACTA-software, a threshold of -950 HU was used with a noise-correction range between -910 and-950 HU to calculate the relative amount of emphysema in % of the respective lung portion 49 . While usually global ESI was measured, only the contralateral non-affected lung side was used if one lung was severely affected from the tumor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lung and emphysema segmentation were performed calculating the ESI from clinically indicated preoperative CT scans taken with mixed technical parameters. After automated lung segmentation using the YACTA-software, a threshold of -950 HU was used with a noise-correction range between -910 and-950 HU to calculate the relative amount of emphysema in % of the respective lung portion 49 . While usually global ESI was measured, only the contralateral non-affected lung side was used if one lung was severely affected from the tumor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, a fixed percentile value may be used in emphysema measurement and disease evaluation [8-10]. The 15th percentile point has been set as the threshold value in HU, below which 15% of voxels with the lowest density are distributed [6, 11, 12]. The 15th percentile below –950 HU correlate well with FEV 1 [9].…”
Section: Ct Quantification Of Emphysemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many software programs perform these functions, the results obtained vary across software vendors. In particular, the right minor fissure, which is often incomplete and undulating in course, is a major source of variation of lobar segmentation and quantification [11]. Automated CT densitometry does show agreement with pulmonary function testing: total lung capacity (TLC) at maximum inspiration measured using automated segmentation software, computer-aided lung informatics for pathology evaluation and rating (CALIPER), has a high correlation with whole body plethysmography (correlation coefficient of 0.88, p < 0.001) [19].…”
Section: Ct Quantification Of Emphysemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual phenotyping, as commonly used in clinical routine, refers to a standardized semiquantitative assessment of the extent of emphysema and airway changes [10]. Imagingdriven phenotyping may help to more accurately guide specific therapy than solely relying on pulmonary function testing (PFT) [21]. It is assumed that there is an emphasis of emphysema on the upper lobes in smoking-related COPD, whereas AATD mainly involves the lower lobes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%