2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06682.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully‐covered, self‐expandable metal stents (CSEMS) in malignant distal biliary strictures: Mid‐term evaluation

Abstract: CSEMS appear to provide acceptable short-term patency rates; however, their limited long-term patency and high complication rate might limit their widespread use. Further long-term prospective data are required to confirm this observation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stent removal was attempted in 50 patients and was successful without complication in 39 (78%). 12 After FCSEMS placement, 17 patients proceeded to surgery and 53 patients were deemed unresectable. 28 Early experience with FCSEMS demonstrated safety and efficacy with minimal complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stent removal was attempted in 50 patients and was successful without complication in 39 (78%). 12 After FCSEMS placement, 17 patients proceeded to surgery and 53 patients were deemed unresectable. 28 Early experience with FCSEMS demonstrated safety and efficacy with minimal complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Although PCSEMS have been initially shown to offer better patency over uncovered SEMS, 9 a recent series failed to identify any significant difference between PCSEMS and uncovered SEMS. 12 Recently, Siddiqui et al 13 reported their single-center experience in using a fully silicon-covered SEMS (WallFlex; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) for initial biliary decompression in patients with pancreatic cancer. These limitations led to the development of fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) with anchoring fins to evade tissue hyperplasia at the stent extremities and prevent migration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retrieval techniques for removal of proximally migrated plastic and metal stents include forceps, a Dormia basket, snare, balloon, and a Soehendra stent retriever 12,17,18. A migrated stent may cause frequent cholangitis, as in our case, even if endoscopic revision is successful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…There was limited number of cases about removal of proximally migrated SEMS and also these migrated stents had a normal configuration. Bakhru et al12 reported one patient who experienced proximal migration 58 days following cSEMS insertion but did not describe retrieval technique. Ho et al13 reported that proximal migration of partially covered SEMS occurred in seven cases (1.7%), and migrated stents was extracted by balloon dilation combined with rat tooth extraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be overcome by inserting plastic stents through the lumen of the metal stent, which appears to be more cost-effective, or placement of a further mesh metal stent where technically possible. [11][12][13][14] The decision as to whether to use a plastic or metal stent will frequently depend on the patients' overall health, expected length of survival, quality of life and local expertise. Often, a plastic stent is placed initially while further diagnostic workup is underway.…”
Section: Cholangiocarcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%