2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-019-02009-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional and structural correlates of working memory performance and stability in healthy older adults

Abstract: Objective To identify CT-acquisition parameters accounting for radiomics variability and to develop a post-acquisition CTimage correction method to reduce variability and improve radiomics classification in both phantom and clinical applications. Methods CT-acquisition protocols were prospectively tested in a phantom. The multi-centric retrospective clinical study included CT scans of patients with colorectal/renal cancer liver metastases. Ninety-three radiomics features of first order and texture were extract… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…APOE allele ε4 carriership was defined as APOE alleles ε2/ε4, ε3/ε4, or ε4/ε4. For details on genotyping methods, see the study‐specific details 18–25 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…APOE allele ε4 carriership was defined as APOE alleles ε2/ε4, ε3/ε4, or ε4/ε4. For details on genotyping methods, see the study‐specific details 18–25 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2012 ; Sala-Llonch et al. 2014 ; Vaqué-Alcázar et al. 2020 ) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ( Anthony and Lin 2018 ), whereas we investigated compensation in PF and used structural MRI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final sample was stratified into stable and decliners following the same approach used in a previous publication (Vaqué‐Alcázar et al., 2020), which is based on the performance difference of the N‐back fMRI task. Namely we conducted a principal component analysis to create a composite scale that represented the WM factor (WMf), calculated using the d prime (d′) scores from the 0‐back, 1‐back, 2‐back, and 3‐back conditions during the fMRI task (for further task details, see Section 2.2.4 below and Supporting Information).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%