2021
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2018264118
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional consequences of convergently evolved microscopic skin features on snake locomotion

Abstract: The small structures that decorate biological surfaces can significantly affect behavior, yet the diversity of animal–environment interactions essential for survival makes ascribing functions to structures challenging. Microscopic skin textures may be particularly important for snakes and other limbless locomotors, where substrate interactions are mediated solely through body contact. While previous studies have characterized ventral surface features of some snake species, the functional consequences of these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in an ichnological study comparing the tracks of Tiliqua to putative belly‐dragging trackways, Curth et al (2014) suggest that friction, or even adhesion, between the belly and the substrate may impose limitations upon movement speed during locomotion. This hypothesis is substantiated by experimental studies of snake and sandfish locomotion that highlight the substantial resistant forces of friction, which require powerful muscular forces to be overcome (Goldman & Hu, 2010; Hu et al, 2009; Rieser et al, 2021). Indeed, these frictional costs are sufficiently high as to cancel the energetic gains associated with their streamlined morphology and the lower inertial losses associated with limblessness (Hu & Shelley, 2012; Walton et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, in an ichnological study comparing the tracks of Tiliqua to putative belly‐dragging trackways, Curth et al (2014) suggest that friction, or even adhesion, between the belly and the substrate may impose limitations upon movement speed during locomotion. This hypothesis is substantiated by experimental studies of snake and sandfish locomotion that highlight the substantial resistant forces of friction, which require powerful muscular forces to be overcome (Goldman & Hu, 2010; Hu et al, 2009; Rieser et al, 2021). Indeed, these frictional costs are sufficiently high as to cancel the energetic gains associated with their streamlined morphology and the lower inertial losses associated with limblessness (Hu & Shelley, 2012; Walton et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This hypothesis is substantiated by experimental studies of snake and sandfish locomotion that highlight the substantial resistant forces of friction, which require powerful muscular forces to be overcome (Goldman & Hu, 2010;Hu et al, 2009;Rieser et al, 2021). Indeed, these frictional costs are sufficiently high as to cancel the energetic gains associated with their streamlined morphology and the lower inertial losses associated with limblessness (Hu & Shelley, 2012;Walton et al, 1990).…”
Section: The Cost(s) Of Belly Draggingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…in terms of locomotory performance. This perspective recently received notable experimental support with evidence of evolutionary convergence in the ventral skin of sidewinding vipers across world deserts [30]. Their skin indeed evolved from well-documented anisotropic textures in non-sidewinders, to isotropic ones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Despite these challenges, a recent convergence between zoologists, physicists, mathematicians, and roboticists has provided new impetus towards understanding the organization of out-of-plane behaviors [14,22,[27][28][29][30]. Among these, particular attention has been devoted to sidewinding (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 4–10 ] However, given the complexity of biological behaviors, emulating and investigating these natural modes of locomotion with engineered systems has been challenging. [ 11–13 ] In this respect, burgeoning effort has been devoted to developing new simulation tools, physical models, and experimental platforms. Among these engineering tools, soft robotic systems are promising in light of their biologically relevant mechanical compliance, deformability, and modes of locomotion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%