2021
DOI: 10.3390/life11070659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Effects In Silico Prediction for Androgen Receptor Ligand-Binding Domain Novel I836S Mutation

Abstract: Over 1000 mutations are described in the androgen receptor (AR) gene. Of those, about 600 were found in androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) patients, among which 400 mutations affect the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the AR protein. Recently, we reported a novel missense mutation c.2507T>G I836S (ClinVarID: 974911) in a patient with complete AIS (CAIS) phenotype. In the present study, we applied a set of computational approaches for the structural analysis of the ligand-binding domains in a wild-type and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The level of pore clearance and the overall geometry were tested with a multifunctional tool Caver Analyst 2.0 (Masaryk University. Czech Republic), which is incredibly convenient for the identification of internal implied movement [85][86][87][88][89].…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of pore clearance and the overall geometry were tested with a multifunctional tool Caver Analyst 2.0 (Masaryk University. Czech Republic), which is incredibly convenient for the identification of internal implied movement [85][86][87][88][89].…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the inner cavity and entrance tunnel volatility assessment and demonstration of the effects of the STARD8 p.R887C and p.S993N substitutions, CAVER Analyst 2.0 software was applied [15][16][17][18]. The radius of the inner cavity and the radius of the entrance tunnels were calculated for every snapshot of the trajectory.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%