2016
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional genetic screens for enhancer elements in the human genome using CRISPR-Cas9

Abstract: Systematic identification of noncoding regulatory elements has, to date, mainly relied on large-scale reporter assays that do not reproduce endogenous conditions. We present two distinct CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens to identify and characterize functional enhancers in their native context. Our strategy is to target Cas9 to transcription factor binding sites in enhancer regions. We identified several functional enhancer elements and characterized the role of two of them in mediating p53 (TP53) and ERα (ESR1) gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
266
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 370 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
266
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, optimal gene expression can be elucidated by targeting dCas9 at different positions on the studied promoter [16,17,44]. This feature is subject to several parameters, such as the distance to TSS, condition dependent presence of transcription factors, chromatin accessibility, but the complete understanding of how to obtain precise regulation has yet to be characterized and is most likely dependent on specific promoters [57,91]. For example, Deaner et al recently developed a graded expression platform that can be employed to systematically test enzyme perturbation sensitivities (STEPS), and assists to identify potential flux limiting enzymes arising from production pathways [16] (Fig.…”
Section: Dcas9-transcriptional Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, optimal gene expression can be elucidated by targeting dCas9 at different positions on the studied promoter [16,17,44]. This feature is subject to several parameters, such as the distance to TSS, condition dependent presence of transcription factors, chromatin accessibility, but the complete understanding of how to obtain precise regulation has yet to be characterized and is most likely dependent on specific promoters [57,91]. For example, Deaner et al recently developed a graded expression platform that can be employed to systematically test enzyme perturbation sensitivities (STEPS), and assists to identify potential flux limiting enzymes arising from production pathways [16] (Fig.…”
Section: Dcas9-transcriptional Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a). These reagents can bypass the epigenetic constraints of gene expression within a cell and have been used for a variety of genomewide screens to efficiently silence either single or multiple genes or silence the influence of regulatory domains in the native genomic context 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58.…”
Section: Dna Methylation and Demethylationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility will be to produce 'custom-made' models for human genetic diseases in which mice will carry a point mutation equivalent to that found in a given patient. Finally, tackling the poorly explored noncoding part of the genome, that is, the noncoding RNAs and regulatory sequences, becomes feasible (Korkmaz et al 2016). The production of new transgenic lines is not a rate-limiting step anymore.…”
Section: Crispr/cas9 and The Future Of Endocrinologymentioning
confidence: 99%