2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional specialization of macaque premotor F5 subfields with respect to hand and mouth movements: A comparison of task and resting-state fMRI

Abstract: Based on architectonic, tract-tracing or functional criteria, the rostral portion of ventral premotor cortex in the macaque monkey, also termed area F5, has been divided into several subfields. Cytoarchitectonical investigations suggest the existence of three subfields, F5c (convexity), F5p (posterior) and F5a (anterior). Electrophysiological investigations have suggested a gradual dorso-ventral transition from hand-to mouth-dominated motor fields, with F5p and ventral F5c strictly related to hand movements an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only in a single hemisphere of M2 did we observe activations in the frontal cortex (Figures 3, 4). A closer examination of these activations showed an overlap with the ventral premotor and the frontal operculum (insular) areas that show orofacial and gustatory responses (Maranesi et al, 2012;Kaskan et al, 2019;Sharma et al, 2019). Such responses in our setup can obviously be related to reward delivery or reward anticipation since the monkey worked for juice reward during the scanning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Only in a single hemisphere of M2 did we observe activations in the frontal cortex (Figures 3, 4). A closer examination of these activations showed an overlap with the ventral premotor and the frontal operculum (insular) areas that show orofacial and gustatory responses (Maranesi et al, 2012;Kaskan et al, 2019;Sharma et al, 2019). Such responses in our setup can obviously be related to reward delivery or reward anticipation since the monkey worked for juice reward during the scanning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In addition, while the present work addressed issues regarding the reproducibility of findings by replicating analyses in independent samples, our understanding of their functional significance is based on a meta-analysis and so the precise functional meaning of the observed differences remains largely a matter of conjecture 54,79 . In order to fully appreciate the significance of these cross species differences in brain organization for human cognition, it will be necessary to understand how these patterns change across contexts, and, if possible, during active tasks states 80,81 . Understanding how functional patterns change across a common embedded space during periods of task engagement, could provide invaluable insight into how evolution has shaped many important aspects of human cognition 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, these networks included mostly neighbouring regions, rather than anatomically connected zones, as well as very few distant regions, except for homologous contralateral areas. Sharma and colleagues ( 2019 ) describe different patterns of rs-FC of F5 subdivisions using a contrast agent for enhancing signals in awake macaque monkeys. Their results appear to be very similar to those we observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previously described limitations appear to be a common problem of rs-FC in macaques, even when different approaches are used (Mars et al 2011;Neubert et al 2014;Hutchison et al 2015;Sharma et al 2019). Using a different rs-FC analysis, not requiring a priori seed definition, Hutchinson and colleagues (2011) defined eleven different networks across the entire macaque cortex.…”
Section: Comparing Resting State Mri With Neural Tracingmentioning
confidence: 99%