2022
DOI: 10.3997/1365-2397.fb2022008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental Noise — the Key to Recovering Your Signal: an Integrated Workflow for Seismic Survey Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CROP-04 Frontiers in Earth Science frontiersin.org (Manning et al, 2019;Dieulangard et al, 2021;Strobbia et al, 2022).…”
Section: Parameterunclassified
“…CROP-04 Frontiers in Earth Science frontiersin.org (Manning et al, 2019;Dieulangard et al, 2021;Strobbia et al, 2022).…”
Section: Parameterunclassified
“…One type of noise we address in this study is coherent along the recorded traces (vertical direction) and incoherent in the offset (horizontal) direction. This trace‐wise noise includes cross‐feed noise (after stacking), swell noise, streamers bird noise, velocity sensor noise and spike‐like noise in marine data (Hlebnikov et al., 2021), receivers malfunctioning noise and noises resulting from external sources of energy in common receiver gathers (Strobbia et al., 2022). Also, in pseudo‐deblending, the blending noises become trace‐wise incoherent after specific rearrangements of data (S. Wang et al., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, recorded noise from an external source that appears as a coherent event in a CSG can become random in a CRG shows the location of the section presented in (a). [33]. Therefore, for reconstructing the missing or corrupted parts of data, which rely on the predictability of events, it is beneficial to use all these arrangements of the data for learning the continuity of different events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%