Fungal Biomolecules 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118958308.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fungal biofilms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A potential disadvantage of this effect is that hydrophobic soils will have a slower rewetting rate (Olorunfemi et al, 2014). Fungal EPS, biofilms (de Siqueira, 2015), and glomalin‐related proteins (GSRPs) also can enhance soil hydrophobic properties (Wright et al, 1996). Moreover, fungi can also affect water retention via indirect effects through their impact on soil structure (Augé et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential disadvantage of this effect is that hydrophobic soils will have a slower rewetting rate (Olorunfemi et al, 2014). Fungal EPS, biofilms (de Siqueira, 2015), and glomalin‐related proteins (GSRPs) also can enhance soil hydrophobic properties (Wright et al, 1996). Moreover, fungi can also affect water retention via indirect effects through their impact on soil structure (Augé et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%