2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000167138.52283.aa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Signs in the Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Mammography

Abstract: The application of a second evaluation method in those cases remaining unclear in Göttingen score can lead to a decrease of uncertainty and a higher sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis in MR mammography. In this study, Göttingen score reaches a sensitivity of 83.1% and a specificity of 58.8%, increasing to a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 76.5% when being extended by a second evaluation method in unclear cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, using the MIPT also has limitations. It affects the number of FPs negatively, as it is very sensitive to artifacts and noise, and may lead to overestimation of lesion size due to the ''blooming sign'' effect (31)(32)(33). Second, our system has a higher number of FP findings if compared with other academic software and to commercially available solutions (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using the MIPT also has limitations. It affects the number of FPs negatively, as it is very sensitive to artifacts and noise, and may lead to overestimation of lesion size due to the ''blooming sign'' effect (31)(32)(33). Second, our system has a higher number of FP findings if compared with other academic software and to commercially available solutions (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, numerous other studies indicate that the high signal intensity in lesions on T2-w MRI is distinctive in the discrimination between benign and malignant lesions [67,68,69,70,71,72]. Few other studies conclude that T2-w features are promising diagnostic features for the classification of benign and malignant lesions [73,74,75]. Above all, it is standard clinical practice to use T2-w MRI for the diagnosis of cancer in breast MRI.…”
Section: Breast Mri Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static T 2 -weighted images provide complementary information for discriminating benign fibroadenoma from malignant cancers, as both expose similar enhancement patterns in the DCE T 1 -weighted images. Furthermore, several secondary signs such as edemas, which frequently accompany pathological tissue growth, are accentuated in T 2 -weighted images [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%