2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2017.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further triple integral approach to mixed-delay-dependent stability of time-delay neutral systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table , we calculate the MADUBs h of the linear neutral‐type system for τ d = 0.6 and different μ 1 , μ 2 by using Theorem and methods in () are compared. From the table, it is found that the NoVs of our criteria are bigger than those of the criteria (), however, the MADUBs computed by our criteria are larger.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In Table , we calculate the MADUBs h of the linear neutral‐type system for τ d = 0.6 and different μ 1 , μ 2 by using Theorem and methods in () are compared. From the table, it is found that the NoVs of our criteria are bigger than those of the criteria (), however, the MADUBs computed by our criteria are larger.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 1. Consider the linear neutral-type system (1) with the time-varying delays, and the system parameters are described as: In Table 1, we calculate the MADUBs h of the linear neutral-type system (1) for d = 0.6 and different 1 , 2 by using Theorem 1 and methods in [23,24,29,39,40] are compared. From the table, it is found that the NoVs of our criteria are bigger than those of the criteria [23,24,39,40], however, the MADUBs computed by our criteria are larger.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth noting that though multiple time‐delays are existing in a neutral system, the authors of [10, 11] utilised individual information on each delay to construct the LKFs, which seem to be conservative to some extent. In order to overcome this point, some novel LKF terms were proposed to represent the interconnection between time‐delays [1214], which was later extended to time‐varying delays [15, 16]. However, the LKF terms in [1216] are only concerning with the relationship between delays' bounds but not time‐varying delays themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%