2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijep.2016.10000746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of landslide caused by underground mining subsidence and its monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify the validity and applicability of the proposed EFAHP-SPA model, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method [18,19] and the entropy-SPA model [4] were used to evaluate the stability of four sample slopes in the study area, respectively, and the calculation results of the three methods were compared and analyzed. To facilitate the comparative analysis, the weight of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is calculated using the subjective weight determined in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To verify the validity and applicability of the proposed EFAHP-SPA model, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method [18,19] and the entropy-SPA model [4] were used to evaluate the stability of four sample slopes in the study area, respectively, and the calculation results of the three methods were compared and analyzed. To facilitate the comparative analysis, the weight of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is calculated using the subjective weight determined in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate the comparative analysis, the weight of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is calculated using the subjective weight determined in this paper. In addition, when judging the slope stability grade, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method uses the conventional maximum membership principle to judge the stability [18], while the entropy-SPA model uses the confidence criterion to judge the stability grade. e results of slope stability evaluation by these two methods are shown in Tables 10 and 11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since there are many factors affecting slope stability, no matter what method is used in the quantitative evaluation, all factors cannot be taken into account. Based on this, Yang et al (2016) used a fuzzy evaluation method and combined qualitative and quantitative methods to analyze the slope stability of coal mining subsidence areas. Wang et al (2020) adopted CRITIC method to obtain objective weights of slope evaluation indexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%