2021
DOI: 10.1109/tla.2021.9447700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy Logic Application in Multi-Period Performance Analysis of a SWTP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these models the MBNA model is observed to be most effective in terms of quality and sludge levels. While, in terms of computational complexity PD (Deng et al 2020), AOPO (Deng et al 2020), SVI (Khan et al 2018), IMCDR (Elsahwi et al 2019), FLSWTP (Lamas & Giacaglia 2021), and MA (Deng et al 2020) are the most effective, but, MEDL (Heo et al 2021), FLSWTP (Lamas & Giacaglia 2021), MBNA (Cheriyamundath & Vavilala 2021), SPIC (Tung et al 2018), MWH (Karlsson et al 2019), and NP (Cheriyamundath & Vavilala 2021) have the lowest treatment delay. This is because the later models utilize chemical reactions in order to speed-up the treatment process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these models the MBNA model is observed to be most effective in terms of quality and sludge levels. While, in terms of computational complexity PD (Deng et al 2020), AOPO (Deng et al 2020), SVI (Khan et al 2018), IMCDR (Elsahwi et al 2019), FLSWTP (Lamas & Giacaglia 2021), and MA (Deng et al 2020) are the most effective, but, MEDL (Heo et al 2021), FLSWTP (Lamas & Giacaglia 2021), MBNA (Cheriyamundath & Vavilala 2021), SPIC (Tung et al 2018), MWH (Karlsson et al 2019), and NP (Cheriyamundath & Vavilala 2021) have the lowest treatment delay. This is because the later models utilize chemical reactions in order to speed-up the treatment process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%