Fuzzy Model for Selecting a Form of Use Alternative for a Historic Building to be Subjected to Adaptive Reuse

Fedorczak-Cisak, Małgorzata; Kowalska-Koczwara, Alicja; Pachla, Filip; Radziszewska–Zielina, Elżbieta; Szewczyk, Bartłomiej; Śladowski, Grzegorz; Tatara, Tadeusz

doi:10.3390/en13112809

Cited by 26 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ribera et al (2020) chose the monumental Palazzo Genovese in Italy and used an AHP model to analyse the social, cultural, and economic value of the reuse function of this architectural heritage through multiple dimensions to obtain the highest valuation and best use. Fedorczak-Cisak et al (2020) believe that many of the criteria used to evaluate reuse are interrelated and have a nonlinear nature, which requires a network-based model. Specifically, they use the FWINGS framework (fuzzy extensions on weighted influence non-linear gauge systems) to rank the uses (including issues relating to society, economics, and energy efficiency) of a heritage building in Poland.…”

Section: Discussion Based On the Multi-criteria Decision Model (Mcdm)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Research frameworks, methodologies, and assessment methods concerning the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: a review

Zhao

Huang

et al. 2021

Built Heritage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the growing trend towards preserving global architectural heritage, the adaptive reuse of built heritage buildings is becoming increasingly popular; as commentators have noted, this popularity can in part be attributed to the economic, cultural, and social benefits they provide to urban communities. In considering adaptive reuse, urban developers and planners seek to reach an equilibrium in the battle between time and space. Both academically and practically, the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings requires compatible, appropriate, and scientific means for assessing built heritage assets; however, currently, research in this area is still relatively meagre. To address this gap, this paper investigates research frameworks, methodologies, and assessment methods that concern the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage. In this paper, we examine the current literature on the paradigms for applying mixed methodologies: the multi-criteria decision model (MCDM) and the preference measurement model (PMM). Specifically, in examining the extant literature, we explore the ways in which these methods are discussed, compared, and evaluated, and the positive functions of these methods are also highlighted. In addition, this review examines a range of cases to better clarify the research frameworks, methodologies, and assessment methods used in the study of the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Based On the Multi-criteria Decision Model (Mcdm)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Research frameworks, methodologies, and assessment methods concerning the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: a review

Zhao

Huang

et al. 2021

Built Heritage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Palma et al [88], using a 3D modeling interface and visual programming language scripting approach, presented an optimized remediation and reuse plan able to support the discussion on possible site regeneration options. Efforts have also been undertaken to further add inputs to the wider discussion on adaptive reuse using fuzzy sets theory [89][90][91].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Integrated SWOT-PESTLE-AHP Model Assessing Sustainability in Adaptive Reuse Projects

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the recent past, sustainable development has been considered a major issue for urban and regional studies. Adaptive reuse appears to be a practical solution for sustainable urban development. Beyond and in addition to a conceptual base consistent with circular economy and sustainability principles, how do we know if adaptive reuse is actually sustainable, provided that it constitutes a multidisciplinary and multilevel process? The present study aims at evaluating, in as much as feasible quantitative terms, adaptive reuse practices sustainability. This was attained using a set of indicators, developed combining PESTLE (the Political, Economic, Technical, Social, Legal, and Environmental aspects) and SWOT (the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) approaches, of which the results were subjected to evaluation by experts (pairwise comparisons), following the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The indicators representing strengths and opportunities of the process were calculated to be of higher value (overall level of final cumulative indicators values; 70.4%) compared with indicators representing weaknesses and threats. Enhancing strengths and opportunities and counteracting weaknesses and threats contribute making the potential of adaptive reuse practices in urban sustainability more evident. Among analysis dimensions, political and economic aspects rank first, followed by environmental, socio-cultural, technological-technical, and legal aspect. The empirical results of this paper serve as a useful reference point for decision-making and policy formulation addressing adaptive reuse practices in sustainable development strategies.

show abstract

“…Due to the inaccuracy and incompleteness of the information that experts make in the early stages of the decision-making process, the authors use the FDM to make decisions in order to determine the certainty and uncertainty of the impact of criteria and sub-criteria. After deleting and combining the criteria, the most effective criteria and sub-criteria are prepared for weighting (Fedorczak-Cisak et al, 2020). To determine the importance and weight of each criterion and sub-criterion, Shannon entropy method has been used.…”

Section: Most Appropriate Use For Historic Buildingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A theoretical framework for developing the MAU model to determine the most appropriate use for historic buildings

Sharifi

Farahinia

2021

ECAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study is to develop an accurate assessment tool to identify the factors that may influence determining the appropriate use for historic buildings.Design/methodology/approachThe research method in this study is qualitative. The integrated MCDM (multi-criteria decision-making) method is used to determine the most appropriate use for historic buildings, which ultimately led to the development of the MAU (most appropriate use) model.FindingsThe results of this study show that, in terms of preserving identity and cultural heritage, the role intangible criteria have to play is seemingly more important than that of tangible criteria. Also, weighted criteria in the matrix relating the “use” options demonstrate cultural-social, commercial and educational uses being apparently more important than other uses.Originality/valueThe novelty of this research is in providing a framework to facilitate contribution to determine the most suitable use for historic buildings with the ability to set criteria and separate weights for each building aiming to increase the useful life to the maximum extent and delaying the need for a subsequent major overhaul.

show abstract

Fuzzy Model for Selecting a Form of Use Alternative for a Historic Building to be Subjected to Adaptive Reuse

Cited by 26 publications

References 54 publications

Research frameworks, methodologies, and assessment methods concerning the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: a review

Research frameworks, methodologies, and assessment methods concerning the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: a review

An Integrated SWOT-PESTLE-AHP Model Assessing Sustainability in Adaptive Reuse Projects

A theoretical framework for developing the MAU model to determine the most appropriate use for historic buildings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About