1999
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GADD45 induction of a G 2 /M cell cycle checkpoint

Abstract: G 1 ͞S and G 2 ͞M cell cycle checkpoints maintain genomic stability in eukaryotes in response to genotoxic stress. We report here both genetic and functional evidence of a Gadd45-mediated G 2 ͞M checkpoint in human and murine cells. Increased expression of Gadd45 via microinjection of an expression vector into primary human fibroblasts arrests the cells at the G 2 ͞M boundary with a phenotype of MPM2 immunopositivity, 4n DNA content and, in 15% of the cells, centrosome separation. The Gadd45-mediated G 2 ͞M ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

27
451
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 582 publications
(481 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
27
451
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, microinjecting a gadd45a expression vector into primary human fibroblasts arrested the cells at the G2/M boundary of the cell cycle (21). Given that gadd45a is a transcriptional target to p53 activation, these observations implicate Gadd45a in p53 mediated G2/M cell cycle arrest in response to certain genotoxic stress agents (21). The genomic instability observed in gadd45a null mice (22) may reflect perturbations in G2/M cell cycle progression &/or impaired DNA repair.…”
Section: Gadd45 Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, microinjecting a gadd45a expression vector into primary human fibroblasts arrested the cells at the G2/M boundary of the cell cycle (21). Given that gadd45a is a transcriptional target to p53 activation, these observations implicate Gadd45a in p53 mediated G2/M cell cycle arrest in response to certain genotoxic stress agents (21). The genomic instability observed in gadd45a null mice (22) may reflect perturbations in G2/M cell cycle progression &/or impaired DNA repair.…”
Section: Gadd45 Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell cycle arrest-In human endothelial & fibroblast cells inhibiting endogenous Gadd45 expression by antisense gadd45 impaired the G2/M checkpoint following exposure to either UV radiation or MMS (2). In addition, microinjecting a gadd45a expression vector into primary human fibroblasts arrested the cells at the G2/M boundary of the cell cycle (21). Given that gadd45a is a transcriptional target to p53 activation, these observations implicate Gadd45a in p53 mediated G2/M cell cycle arrest in response to certain genotoxic stress agents (21).…”
Section: Gadd45 Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GADD45B and GADD45G are members of the GADD45 family of proteins that are induced by genotoxic stresses and various apoptotic cytokines [11][12][13] and are involved in cell cycle arrest, [14][15][16][17][18][19] DNA repair, [20][21][22] cell survival, [22][23][24][25][26][27] and apoptosis. These functions are mediated by proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), cell division control 2 (CDC2), cyclin B1 (CCNB1), and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (CDKN1A; also known as p21), which are classified in the GO "cell cycle" category.…”
Section: Molecularmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, Gadd45a, Gadd45b and Gadd45g have been implicated in cell cycle arrest (Beadling et al, 1993;Hollander et al, 1999;Wang et al, 1999;Zhang et al, 1999), DNA repair (Smith et al, 1994;Vairapandi et al, 1996), apoptosis (Harkin et al, 1999;Vairapandi et al, 2000;Azam et al, 2001;Takekawa et al, 2002;Yoo et al, 2003), cell survival (Smith et al, 1996;De Smaele et al, 2001;Zazzeroni et al, 2003;Papa et al, 2004;Gupta et al, 2005), genomic stability (Hollander et al, 1999), inflammatory response and innate immunity (Lu et al, 2001;Yang et al, 2001;Lu et al 2004). Gadd45 proteins have been shown to stimulate the p38-c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways in response to stress situations and thereby sensitize cells for growth arrest, apoptosis or survival (Takekawa and Saito, 1998;Harkin et al, 1999;De Smaele et al, 2001;Lu et al, 2001;Hildesheim et al, 2002;Yoo et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%