1993
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(93)91264-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GALLEX solar neutrino observations. The results from GALLEX I and early results from GALLEX II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fluctuations on the time scale of a radiochemical experiment's run would broaden the distribution of count rates, since different runs would have different survival probabilities. None of the experiments currently operating has noted a broader distribution of rates than expected [13,14,15], suggesting that the neutrino data will probably limit, rather than measure, such fluctuations. For the favored, small-angle solution, the variance is strongly peaked when neutrinos are produced near the resonance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fluctuations on the time scale of a radiochemical experiment's run would broaden the distribution of count rates, since different runs would have different survival probabilities. None of the experiments currently operating has noted a broader distribution of rates than expected [13,14,15], suggesting that the neutrino data will probably limit, rather than measure, such fluctuations. For the favored, small-angle solution, the variance is strongly peaked when neutrinos are produced near the resonance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We now have available 65 measurements in the GALLEX series (GALLEX I: Anselmann et al, 1993;GALLEX II: Anselmann et al, 1995;Kirsten et al, 1995; GALLEX III: Hampel et al, 1996;GALLEX IV: Hampel et al, 1999) and 58 in the GNO series (Altmann et al, 2000;Kirsten et al, 2003;Altmann et al, 2005). We have taken data from the tables in these articles, except that, for run 42, we adopt for the lower error estimate the value 50 shown in Figure 1 of Hampel et al (1999), rather than the earlier zero value in Table 3 of Hampel et al (1996).…”
Section: Gallex and Gno Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, despite the ∼ tenfold difference between their thresholds of 7.3 and 0.8 MeV, respectively, Kamiokande and Homestake find similar capture rates (Davis 1994). While both of these are still well below that predicted, experiments sensitive to lower energy thresholds, SAGE (Abdurashitov et al 1994) and GALLEX (Anselmann et al 1993), detect rates closer to theoretical predictions. Barring experimental error this would indicate a maximum in the 'missing neutrino spectrum' near the 1-7 MeV range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%