2021
DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2021.1945879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Game variables that predict success and performance level in elite men’s volleyball

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Related to the attack effect, it was observed that the 1st placed team had higher eigenvector values for the attack point, the 3rd placed team for the attack error and the other teams showed higher eigenvector values for the attack continuity. The results corroborate the current literature, since the attack points distinguish the chances of winning the set and the game [ 21 , 63 ]. The volleyball game claims the attack with power in vulnerable areas of the opposing team, limiting the possibilities of defensive organization [ 19 , 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Related to the attack effect, it was observed that the 1st placed team had higher eigenvector values for the attack point, the 3rd placed team for the attack error and the other teams showed higher eigenvector values for the attack continuity. The results corroborate the current literature, since the attack points distinguish the chances of winning the set and the game [ 21 , 63 ]. The volleyball game claims the attack with power in vulnerable areas of the opposing team, limiting the possibilities of defensive organization [ 19 , 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…volleyball. On the contrary, for top-level male volleyball players, serve was reported as a disadvantage for the serving team 7,28 due to the many faults served by male teams in an effort to serve more strongly in order not to lose the rally directly, 15,29 because of the overall performance of the male team in skills of Complex 1 (side-out).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have shown that attacking is the main predictor of winning a match. [8][9][10][11][12] Additionally, blocking was the skill that differentiated the top and low-level teams in the 2000 Olympics 13 and was a predictor of successful placement in a top-level male tournament. 14 Most studies were based on data collected in national championships 8,15,16 and international events, 11,[17][18][19] but without separating the performance of the teams according to the final score.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In national and international men´s competitions, several researches have considered the K1 as the complex that best predicts the success of teams through its effectiveness (Patsiaouras et al, 2009;Ugrinowitsch et al, 2014), reaching success rates close to 65% (García- de-Alcaráz et al, 2020;Sánchez-Moreno et al, 2015), and assuming the spike performance to be the greatest indicator and predictor of K1 performance (Drikos et al, 2021;Marelić et al, 2004). Although the spike is the main predictor of K1 performance, there are studies that show the relevance of the reception and placement pass in the success of the subsequent attack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%