2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603865
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GAMEC – a new intensive protocol for untreated poor prognosis and relapsed or refractory germ cell tumours

Abstract: There is no consensus as to the management of untreated poor prognosis or relapsed/refractory germ cell tumours. We have studied an intensive cisplatin-based regimen that incorporates high-dose methotrexate (HD MTX) and actinomycin-D and etoposide every 14 days (GAMEC). Sixty-two patients were enrolled in a phase 2 study including 27 who were untreated (IGCCCG, poor prognosis) and 35 with progression despite conventional platinum based chemotherapy. The pharmacokinetics of the drugs were correlated with standa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This review was initiated 4 years ago due to the authors' clinical and pathological experience, gained in phase 2 trials of novel treatments for relapsed germ cell tumours, 6 that elderly men with germ cell tumours tended to present late, and responded more poorly to chemotherapy when compared with younger men. Due to their rarity, even in referral practice, a retrospective cohort has been collected from a number of sources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review was initiated 4 years ago due to the authors' clinical and pathological experience, gained in phase 2 trials of novel treatments for relapsed germ cell tumours, 6 that elderly men with germ cell tumours tended to present late, and responded more poorly to chemotherapy when compared with younger men. Due to their rarity, even in referral practice, a retrospective cohort has been collected from a number of sources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fold variability compared to observed values ranged from 1.2‐fold to 1.6‐fold, depending on dose group (Figure B). The model prediction was compared to data obtained from an adult PK study dataset . The visual predictive check (Figure ) showed that the simulated mean concentration–time profile fell within the observed results; however, the simulation failed to capture the full variability of the observed data (observed AUC 0‐26h SD: 595.33 ng h ml −1 , simulated AUC 0‐26h SD: 9.04 ng h ml −1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The data for patients in the 1–<6 and 6–<10 year age bands were utilized for comparison with the simulated data obtained from the model. PK data for 30 adult patients were provided by St Bart's Hospital, London, for further assessment of the model .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salvage therapy: patient 001: Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF), actinomycin D, methotrexate, etoposide, cisplatin (GAMEC) chemotherapy (Shamash et al , 2007b) followed by RPLND showing no viable tumour. Remains progression free 6 years later.Patient 005: GAMEC chemotherapy (Shamash et al , 2007b) followed by RPLND showing no viable tumour. Relapsed in abdomen.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%