“…Assuming Hikita et al [18] Banerjee et al [19] Johannisbauer [20] Lamourelle and Sandal1 [7] Carrubba [21] 1,600 < Re 30 < Re < 150 150<Re< 2,000 340 < Re < 10,900 60 < Re < 300 300<Re< 1,600 1,600 < Re < 10,800 1,300 < Re < 8,300 48 < Re < 280 48 < Re < 280 280<Re< 1,600 280<Re< 1,600 1,600 < Re 1,600 < Re Bakopoulos [22] same as Carrubba except that at t,600 < Re and for Sc > 4.59 [23] 170 < Re < 335 1.668 335 < Re < 1,080 3.882 1,080 < Re < 2,513 0.0008923 Yih and Chen [24] 49 < Re < 300 0.01099 300 < Re < 1,600 0.02995 1,600 < Re < 10,500 0.0009777 (14)- (18), (5) and (7) …”