1987
DOI: 10.1080/09593338709384505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaseous pollutant and acidic rain impacts on crops in the United States: A comparison

Abstract: The effects of gaseous pollutants (O 3 , SO 2 , NO 2 ) and acidic rain were assessed and compared for a wide variety of crop cultivars and species. Such a comparison is useful for evaluating the need and the strategy for controlling pollutant emissions.No measurable and consistent crop yield response from the direct effects of simulated acidic rain at ambient levels has been established, although possible interactions with other stresses needs further study. For some local situations, exposures of SO 2 and com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acid rain adversely affects the ecological and environmental processes (Wang et al, 2018;Wei, Liu, Zhang, & Qin, 2017). Over the last 50 years, several researchers have highlighted the negative environmental impacts of acid rain, including destruction of buildings and tools (Yokom & Bear, 1983), forest and geological formation degradation (Driscoll et al, 2001;Ulrich, 1980), and adverse effects on crops and soil fertility (Ferenbaugh, 1976;Irving, 1987;Pell, Arny, & Pearson, 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acid rain adversely affects the ecological and environmental processes (Wang et al, 2018;Wei, Liu, Zhang, & Qin, 2017). Over the last 50 years, several researchers have highlighted the negative environmental impacts of acid rain, including destruction of buildings and tools (Yokom & Bear, 1983), forest and geological formation degradation (Driscoll et al, 2001;Ulrich, 1980), and adverse effects on crops and soil fertility (Ferenbaugh, 1976;Irving, 1987;Pell, Arny, & Pearson, 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%