2014
DOI: 10.1123/apaq.2013-0084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gauging the Quality of Qualitative Research in Adapted Physical Activity

Abstract: Qualitative inquiry is increasingly being used in adapted physical activity research, which raises questions about how to best evaluate its quality. This article aims to clarify the distinction between quality criteria (the what) and strategies (the how) in qualitative inquiry. An electronic keyword search was used to identify articles pertaining to quality evaluation published between 1995 and 2012 (n=204). A five phase systematic review resulted in the identification of 56 articles for detailed review. Data … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These criteria are also known as reflexivity, credibility, coherence, and contribution, respectively (Zitomer & Goodwin, 2014). Sensitivity to context was addressed by being aware of researcher positionality and bias in the research process.…”
Section: Quality Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These criteria are also known as reflexivity, credibility, coherence, and contribution, respectively (Zitomer & Goodwin, 2014). Sensitivity to context was addressed by being aware of researcher positionality and bias in the research process.…”
Section: Quality Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the participants' experiences were examined qualitatively. Hence, effort was made to ensure that the respondents could speak 'in their own voices' and express their unique, individual sport experiences [2,[23][24][25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both authors through a reflective dialogue, which included discussed interpretations of the transcripts, then critically examined those that were generated in the first independent analysis. To guarantee the quality of this process, credibility and confirmability (Zitomer & Goodwin, 2014) were upheld through member checking with five random pre-services teachers that were asked to give feedback regarding the data under analysis. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%